User talk:Spenk01: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 12:

SELF-REVERT,NOW is a reliable source that we always use,plus multiple newsites reported it,if you don't stop trying to erase rebel gains and put a pro-regime narrative to the wikipedia articles,i will report you to an admin.[[User:Alhanuty|Alhanuty]] ([[User talk:Alhanuty|talk]]) 23:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

:NOW clearly cited pro rebel sources, You can't simply justify rebel advance when NOW claims rebels advanced using pro rebel sources. we clearly agreed that some pro rebel sources might be reliable but you can't use them to justify rebel advance. You are going against the wikipedia rules for editing! [[User:Spenk01|Spenk01]] ([[User talk:Spenk01#top|talk]]) 00:23, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
::did you read the part,a pro-regime activist confirmed it.[[User:Alhanuty|Alhanuty]] ([[User talk:Alhanuty|talk]]) 00:49, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

:::should i quote every time they mentioned 'rebels' and used a link to the source and the only time they said 'regime activists' they didn't even provide a single link?[[User:Spenk01|Spenk01]] ([[User talk:Spenk01#top|talk]]) 01:05, 18 June 2015 (UTC)