User talk:Stevage: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 3,386:

:Really interesting work. I had actually thought in retrospect that the technique was of marginal importance and not really worthy of an article in its own right - perhaps a paragraph or two in an article about digital sensors, or something. Your edit convinces me otherwise - so, well done. :) One thing you might consider adding is clarifying early in the article that it's a ''temporary'' overexposure, that will be corrected in postprocessing. [[User Talk:Stevage|Stevage]] 10:42, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

::Thanks for the feedback, Stevage. And for the kind words. ''':-)''' I had carefully considered the phrase ''"ETTR images may appear to be overexposed until they are correctly processed"'', but perhaps I'd focussed too much on the words ''"may appear"'' and not clarified the fact that images ''will'' require processing. I'll fix that. If you could keep an eye on the article I'd appreciate it. Kind regards, [[User:Nagualdesign|nagualdesign]] ([[User talk:Nagualdesign|talk]]) 20:42, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

== Stevage, the word's "behavior", not "behaviour" ==

Dear Stevage,

I have to say, Stevage, that the word's "behavior", not "behaviour". So why do you spell the word "behavior" as "behaviour"? Are you a Canadian? A British Wikipedian? Where '''''<u>exactly</u>''''' are you from?

Sincerely, [[User:3.14159265358pi|3.14159265358pi]] ([[User talk:3.14159265358pi|talk]]) 22:46, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

===Explanation===

{{Remember to copy this section before saving it, then paste it to [[User talk:3.14159265358pi|my talk page]], but don't copy this line!}}