User talk:TheArguer - Wikipedia
2 people in discussion
|
[1], why did you expand and even research the name of the earthquake for a fresh ip addition that was not only blatant vandalism, but obviously an absurd addition? (there is No way that was just to Be funny). This does not behoove someone who was recently granted rollbacker rights.Dave (talk) 14:27, 21 March 2012(UTC)
- Must have been a mistake Dave. AGF here. Wifione Message 15:18, 21 March 2012(UTC)
- Agreed, When I first saw this I thought it was pretty egregious. But the more look at it, it is easily explainable by a lack of caffeine, etc. My apologies if my first response sounded biting. Dave (talk) 17:03, 21 March 2012(UTC)
- Sorry that I'm human. After reverting edits such as "james wuz here," things like this look promising. I even left a nice welcome note on the offender's talk page. I'm glad a real roadgeek looked into it further. I'm not terribly familiar with U.S. Routes and I obviously need to start researching. If it was an Interstate route, I probably would have caught the bullshit, as U.S. Route 6 isn't even remotely close to AZ. No offense taken. Have a good day. =) TheArguer SAY HI! 21:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- I'm quite confused as to how this happened... how does a road temporarily exist during two earthquakes? Especially one in Japan? --Rschen7754 23:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- Lupin's Anti-vandal tool flagged the word "freak" in this edit. I'm usually dealing with absolutely ridiculous edits. I didn't look close enough, it seemed legit, and I wikified it. If I saw the map of the route or actually took time to think about the edit, I would have caught what happened. I don't really know what debating my edit is going to accomplish. I made a stupid mistake, and it was corrected. TheArguer SAY HI! 23:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- All I'm saying is to slow down, and to be careful; quality over quantity here. --Rschen7754 00:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- Lupin's Anti-vandal tool flagged the word "freak" in this edit. I'm usually dealing with absolutely ridiculous edits. I didn't look close enough, it seemed legit, and I wikified it. If I saw the map of the route or actually took time to think about the edit, I would have caught what happened. I don't really know what debating my edit is going to accomplish. I made a stupid mistake, and it was corrected. TheArguer SAY HI! 23:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- I'm quite confused as to how this happened... how does a road temporarily exist during two earthquakes? Especially one in Japan? --Rschen7754 23:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- Sorry that I'm human. After reverting edits such as "james wuz here," things like this look promising. I even left a nice welcome note on the offender's talk page. I'm glad a real roadgeek looked into it further. I'm not terribly familiar with U.S. Routes and I obviously need to start researching. If it was an Interstate route, I probably would have caught the bullshit, as U.S. Route 6 isn't even remotely close to AZ. No offense taken. Have a good day. =) TheArguer SAY HI! 21:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- Agreed, When I first saw this I thought it was pretty egregious. But the more look at it, it is easily explainable by a lack of caffeine, etc. My apologies if my first response sounded biting. Dave (talk) 17:03, 21 March 2012(UTC)
So just because you think its unconstructive you delete it? Look at the pics. Demi's pussy is extremely hairy. Please revert your edit now.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Iwannawikiu (talk • contribs) 22:14, 2 December 2012
- Comment: Honestly, I don't see how it was constructive. It seemed unencyclopedic to me, which was probably the reason for the revert. Not to mention, you've been making edits on other articles such as Paula Deen that add negative information. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:20, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
It's not "negative information." Deen is overweight. FACT. Moore's pussy, as featured in Oui, was extremely hairy. FACT. I am simply providing an expansion of information for the wikipedia user and enhancing their experience. I trust that you will revert these edits immediately.
- These edits not follow Wikipedia's policy regarding information on biography of a living person. I will not revert my edit at this time. TheArguer SAY HI! 22:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
What part of the policy does it not follow. Cut the bullshit and revert the edit, this is petty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iwannawikiu (talk • contribs) 22:34, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
- Please read it; it's pretty self-explanatory. TheArguer SAY HI! 22:42, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Dude, I just told them that they were a meanie-jerk. Antony Dauis — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.114.35 (talk) 23:59, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
- "Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack..." TheArguer SAY HI! 00:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
I sees it and I still think I didn,t attack them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.114.35 (talk) 00:52, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
WHY DID YOU SEND ME A MESSAGE SAYING MY EDIT WAS BAD? I REMOVED A FRENCH WORD THAT SHOULDN'T BE ON THE ENGLISH PAGE TO DESCRIBE MEXICAN FOOD...
GENIUS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.160.148.103 (talk) 00:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
I undid your removal of that section and started a discussion on the talk, which I hope you join. Shadowjams (talk) 01:36, 15 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
There is nothing neutral about 'anti-feminism' or for that matter feminism. And nothing objective about feminist proper-gander and your removal of valid anti-feminist views. such is bias and none objective by a feminist *you) when each anti-feminist point is too valid to be argued against. — Preceding unsigned comment added by90.244.146.125 (talk) 22:03, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
i want to add this line to the page
Without knowing the actual time scale outside the "Universe".We can never be sure of the actual "Universal Time Scale" within this Universe.
its true without knowing how time exsists outside the universe then people will never know how time realy exsists inside this universe making all calculations inaccurate.is very simple to understand.earth time is just make beleaive and meaningless in relevance to the universe.