User talk:TheArguer - Wikipedia
2 people in discussion
|
Thank you for reverting Vandalism to an article I'm working on, Province of North Carolina. That event stemmed from my repeated nominations for speedy deletion of the page Peter Jacobs (Lunatic). The author, User talk:Chris333999 is apparently intent on not only evading CSD, but vandalizing my stuff as well. Cdtew (talk) 14:36, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
- And ow he's vandalizing my user page. please help! Cdtew (talk) 14:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
- No problem. I'll do my best. =) TheArguer SAY HI! 14:41, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
- And ow he's vandalizing my user page. please help! Cdtew (talk) 14:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi. Your edit summary here was actually incorrect. Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hey, TheArguer! I saw this edit of yours that seemed to introduce a typo in an edit meant to fix a typo, and just wanted to leave a playful nudge: maybe that means it's time for bed? :) (Just FYI: I'm about to do that myself; you have no idea how many times I misspelled "typo" in this section header. :P ) Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 04:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
- It's my keyboard's fault, I promise! =) I'm not tired yet, so I'll make sure to be a bit more careful in my edits. Thanks for the heads up. TheArguer SAY HI! 04:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Oh, no worries about that; if you're happy, I'm happy. Just checking in. :) Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 05:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
I was just sent a message saying that I made an edit to the 'Paddy McCourt' page. I never made such an edit, I have never even heard of the man before today, I believe this message was sent in error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.47.58 (talk) 22:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
If you look into the 2015 Atlantic Hurricane Season article, you can see that the strongest storm in infobox implied that's Hurricane Joaquin the strongest with 967mbar.--142.167.118.180 (talk) 23:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hello, TheArguer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply