User talk:The Devil's Advocate: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 447:

:Honestly, I don't know. Usually there is some mention made of a way to appeal a sanction either in the wording about the restriction or on a section of the case page and appeal is mentioned explicitly regarding Ferahgo and Occam. If the position of ArbCom has been that they can appeal at any time then this should probably be stated.--[[User:The Devil's Advocate|The Devil's Advocate]] ([[User talk:The Devil's Advocate#top|talk]]) 23:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

::If they put a restriction on Ferahgo and Occam, but not TrevelyanL85A2, that means TrevelyanL85A2 doesn't have a restriction. [[User:A Quest For Knowledge|A Quest For Knowledge]] ([[User talk:A Quest For Knowledge|talk]]) 00:22, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

== 9/11 TBAN Violation ==

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Balance icon.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] To enforce an [[WP:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision, you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''two weeks'''&nbsp;for Violation of 9/11 TBAN per [[User talk:WGFinley|my talk page]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks]] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. [[User:WGFinley|WGFinley]] ([[User talk:WGFinley|talk]]) 05:34, 15 September 2012 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=349940199#Motions_regarding_Trusilver_and_Arbitration_Enforcement March 2010 decision]</span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as [[WP:AN]] or [[WP:ANI]]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification|proper page]]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock -->

I'm a bit disappointed you have chosen to violate your ban. Whether you think you are being helpful or not doesn't enter into the decision, you are [[WP:TBAN|banned]] from those pages, broadly construed which means going to my talk page about those pages is in violation. --[[User:WGFinley|WGFinley]] ([[User talk:WGFinley|talk]]) 05:34, 15 September 2012 (UTC)