User talk:ThisMr - Wikipedia

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Prabhloch Singh, from its old location at User:ThisMr/sandbox/Prabhloch Singh. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello, ThisMr. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Prabhloch Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 05:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Anmolbhat (talk) 15:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Prabhloch Singh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 18:15, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about a user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors may result in you being blocked from editing. Katie^talk 18:51, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I understand and will keep this in mind for future. My intention was only to highlight that the user in question was reaching out to religious leaders after creating their Wiki pages, claiming credit for creation. Then how is the user being anonymous in the first place? Thank you.ThisMr (talk) 19:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Don't use your IP[1] for edit warring again and read WP:SOCKPUPPETRY, abusing IP or another account for making same edits on same article is prohibited. Capitals00 (talk) 04:41, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Have you used any other account(s) other than this one? If so, can you please say exactly what accounts you have used. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 07:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

no. I did happen to not login by mistake but that's it. Hope this helps.ThisMr (talk) 17:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)Reply