User talk:Timotheus Canens: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 71:

-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)</small>}}

<!-- Message sent by User:Mz7@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=817674260 -->

== Topic ban request ==

As you know, my appeal of my topic ban has resulted in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment&oldid=818692237#Pseudoscience:_Arbitrator_views_and_discussion suggestion from Arbitrors] that I appeal via AE on the grounds that it is ''no longer'' needed. Newyorkbrad specifically asked "whether he is confident that [I will] be able to edit them consistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment&diff=818262563&oldid=818239219], and Thryduulf suggested I get editing help.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment&diff=817697316&oldid=817694658]

I know you don't want to revisit a 5-year-old discretionary sanction[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=522442641#Result_concerning_Iantresman], but it makes sense that I ask you for some ''general'' advice, to help prevent me from repeating the problem that persuaded you to make the ban. What could I do differently, to persuade editors of my opinion, that is consistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines? --[[User:Iantresman|Iantresman]] ([[User talk:Iantresman|talk]]) 13:01, 5 January 2018 (UTC)