Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 629: ::::Sure, checkuser would be better than banning users based on as little as a single edit per "[[WP:DUCK]]." In my opinion scibaby is a scapegoat that was created just so people can ban certain users on site, which has resulted in massive IP range blocks, many people being falsely accused and/or blocked. I'm not even sure if it's possible to calculate how many legitimate users and donors that have been aborted by the entire "scibaby" affair. [[User:Thegoodlocust|TheGoodLocust]] ([[User talk:Thegoodlocust|talk]]) 09:36, 31 December 2009 (UTC) :::::Do you have any example of a user being banned based on a single edit per [[WP:DUCK]]? If yes, please tell us. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 10:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC) No. GR is a SPA; if you want to see whether he is serious about improving wiki or just causing disruption, then his attempt to enable wiki-lawyering by [[User:Abd]] is instructive [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] ([[User talk:William M. Connolley|talk]]) 13:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC) == Avast, me hearties! == | |||