Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 17:33, 23 July 2018 edit

BillHPike

(talk | contribs)

Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers

12,427 edits

← Previous edit

Revision as of 18:31, 23 July 2018 edit undo

EdJohnston

(talk | contribs)

Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators

71,034 edits

Next edit →

Line 314:

{{u|Alucard 16}} also left a notice regarding the same material on the user's talk page (seen in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Miss_HollyJ&diff=851577383&oldid=851573161 this diff]) which was reverted by the user prior to the fifth revert. [[User:TheDoctorWho|'''The''''''Doctor''''''Who''']] [[User talk:TheDoctorWho|(talk)]] 09:38, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

:I'm following Wikipedia's guidelines on proper sourcing. Recaps are not considered reliable sources when it comes to talking about a controversy with the public, which I have informed you multiple times. I asked you to provide the "media coverage" you speak of and still haven't done so. I added an actual reliable source, ''[[The Washington Post]]''. [[User:Miss HollyJ|Miss HollyJ]] ([[User talk:Miss HollyJ|talk]]) 15:59, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

::@Miss HollyJ, even if you disapprove of the sources that [[User:TheDoctorWho]] wants to use, this is not a big enough concern to allow you to revert without penalty per [[WP:3RRNO]]. Normally, agreement on quality of sources is reached through discussion among editors. There may still be time for you to back away from the situation. Otherwise, you could be blocked for [[WP:3RR]] violation. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 18:31, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

== [[User:24.172.13.66]] reported by [[User:Billhpike]] (Result: ) ==