Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 992:

<u>Comments:</u><br>

Introman has made 5 non-sequential edits to [[Classical liberalism]] in just over 3 hours, all of which have been reverted by other editors. In each case Introman has made a different edit to the lead. He has stated that he believes that different edits do not count for 3rr[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Introman#Liberalism_2] However it is disruptive edit-warring. Introman even posted a Wikiquette alert against one of the editors for deleting one of his earlier edits.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#User:Snowded] [[User:The Four Deuces|The Four Deuces]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 00:45, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

To the administrators: Please look at this carefully. I did not edit war. I was making different kinds of changes, rather than doing the same thing over and over. I think I also gave good descriptions of my edits in the edit summaries, sourced my additions, and had been discussing things on the talk page. Simply doing more than 3 things to an article that The Four Deuces doesn't like doesn't constitute edit warring. Four Deuces tried to pull a fast one like this here before, and apparently an administrator didn't look closely enough and blocked me. However, I appealed and the block was removed. I had to explicitly and exhaustively prove that I wasn't edit warring in the appeal, as if one is presumed guilty before proven innocent. You can read about it on my talk page. Hopefully someone here will take the time to look at it closely this time so I don't have to go through the same hassle. Thanks. [[User:Introman|Introman]] ([[User talk:Introman|talk]]) 02:04, 15 September 2009 (UTC)▼

Introman also made three reverts on Sept. 13, all of which were reverted by other editors. Even if Introman's last two edits on Sept. 14 were ignored, he still would have exceeded 3rr for a 24 hour period.

Line 1,002 ⟶ 1,000:

[[User:The Four Deuces|The Four Deuces]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 02:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

▲To the administrators: Please look at this carefully. I did not edit war. I was making different kinds of changes, rather than doing the same thing over and over. I think I also gave good descriptions of my edits in the edit summaries, sourced my additions, and had been discussing things on the talk page. Simply doing more than 3 things to an article that The Four Deuces doesn't like doesn't constitute edit warring. Four Deuces tried to pull a fast one like this here before, and apparently an administrator didn't look closely enough and blocked me. However, I appealed and the block was removed. I had to explicitly and exhaustively prove that I wasn't edit warring in the appeal, as if one is presumed guilty before proven innocent. You can read about it on my talk page. Hopefully someone here will take the time to look at it closely this time so I don't have to go through the same hassle. Thanks. [[User:Introman|Introman]] ([[User talk:Introman|talk]]) 02:0450, 15 September 2009 (UTC)