Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 1,125: *::::[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gamergate_controversy&diff=632892868&oldid=632892161] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gamergate_controversy&diff=633006549&oldid=633005134] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gamergate_controversy&diff=633009963&oldid=633008004] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gamergate_controversy&diff=633504022&oldid=633503559] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gamergate_controversy&diff=632891917&oldid=632890836].--[[User:The Devil's Advocate|<font color="vermillion">'''The Devil's Advocate'''</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:The Devil's Advocate|<font color="burntorange">tlk.</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/The Devil's Advocate|<font color="red">cntrb.</font>]]</sub> 18:19, 16 November 2014 (UTC) *:::::TDA, why are you posting all these diffs? Everything I added in these is supported by reliable sources. Just because you disagree doesn't mean it's evidence I should be topic banned. This is gettin ridiculous. Can someone close all this off now?—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">琉竜</font>]]) 19:09, 16 November 2014 (UTC) *::::::[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gamergate_controversy&diff=632619822&oldid=632619703] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gamergate_controversy&diff=632620458&oldid=632619923] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gamergate_controversy&diff=632620940&oldid=632620890] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate_controversy&diff=632623737&oldid=632623671] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate_controversy&diff=632656149&oldid=632655646].--[[User:The Devil's Advocate|<font color="vermillion">'''The Devil's Advocate'''</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:The Devil's Advocate|<font color="burntorange">tlk.</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/The Devil's Advocate|<font color="red">cntrb.</font>]]</sub> 19:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC) *'''Oppose''' A topic ban isn't warranted in my opinion because Ryulong's edits have been balancing in the article, and ANI is a ridiculous platform to vote (indeed, vote) on topic bans. How about admins actually enforce the [[WP:GS/GG]] sanction? Clearly Ryulong's incivil behauvior has violated the "expected standards of conduct" mentioned in the sanctions, even if they do not warrant a topic ban. --[[User:Pudeo|Pudeo]][[User talk:Pudeo|']] 06:16, 16 November 2014 (UTC) *'''Oppose''' per Johnuniq. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]]|[[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 16:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | |||