Content deleted Content added
Line 1,860: ::Generally speaking, Wikipedia doesn't ban people from editing content because of their opinions. Particularly when their opinions appear to concur with both Wikipedia guidelines and the consensus of the community. I have made few edits to the 'duck' essay, and the only significant ones have involved twice reverting an edit by Atsme that the subsequent RfC has demonstrated she shouldn't have made, and of adding links to my own essay, per [[WP:WPESSAYS]]. I have no great wish to edit the ducks essay (as I have made clear, I think it should be deleted), but I think it is reasonable that I should be permitted to ensure that it doesn't become even less compatible with Wikipedia policies, guidelines, and practice. [[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] ([[User talk:AndyTheGrump|talk]]) 05:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC) :::Andy, the first edit I made in over a month you reverted twice without any discussion on the TP which clearly demonstrates [[WP:OWN]] behavior, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Advocacy_ducks&diff=next&oldid=669046337] You falsely called it an attack on Wiki projects, and then started casting aspersions with the second revert [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Advocacy_ducks&diff=next&oldid=669074633]. The RfC has proven nothing because (1) there hasn't been a formal close, (2) there were only 1 or 2 oppose comments that were substantive, and (3) according to [[WP:Wikipedia Essays]] ''disputes between editors writing an essay should be handled differently from writing an article, because there's no need to agree on a single "right" version.'' A few days later and after much disruption by you on the TP you added an improperly formatted link to your essay [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Advocacy_ducks&diff=next&oldid=669142637] and then fixed it. Right after that all hell broke loose and you were right in the middle of it. Soon after I initiated the RfC, your first comment was a snarky PA against me instead of a substantive comment about how to improve the essay which I now see is never going to happen because of your fixated POV and BATTLEGROUND mentality, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Advocacy_ducks&diff=671716931&oldid=671711469]. You kept on making snarky, baseless comments demonstrating your denial that projects don't have advocacy groups, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Advocacy_ducks&diff=671943727&oldid=671939198] even though [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Guide]] says they exist, but you chose instead to attack me refusing to DROPTHESTICK, repeating the same nonsense over and over and over again until our heads were about to explode, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Advocacy_ducks&diff=672138030&oldid=672127469], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Advocacy_ducks&diff=672438410&oldid=672434261], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Advocacy_ducks&diff=673564199&oldid=673561918], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Advocacy_ducks&diff=673585293&oldid=673577614], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Advocacy_ducks&diff=673663782&oldid=673655788], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Advocacy_ducks&diff=673668780&oldid=673667924], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Advocacy_ducks&diff=673851370&oldid=673849808]. You might also want to read the statement by SMcCandlish at the ARBCOM case [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&diff=674188834&oldid=674181001] regarding advocacy groups. And then there's this diff wherein you state that if anyone removes your links again, you'll report them for tendentious editing, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Advocacy_ducks&diff=674259466&oldid=674257316]. Doesn't get anymore ironic than that. <font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">[[User:Atsme|Atsme]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Atsme |📞]][[Special:EmailUser/Atsme|📧]]</sup> 06:38, 3 August 2015 (UTC) ::::'''"The RfC has proven nothing because... there were only 1 or 2 oppose comments that were substantive..."'''? Thank you Atsme, for demonstrating the contempt in which you hold the Wikipedia community. You started an RfC, and now that it isn'y going your way, you appoint yourself judge and jury, and dismiss the views of anyone who disagrees with you. You are beneath contempt, and the sooner Wikipedia gets rid of you the better. [[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] ([[User talk:AndyTheGrump|talk]]) 06:46, 3 August 2015 (UTC) == IP User - Edit War == | |||