Content deleted Content added
Line 1,349: *'''Comment''' Beyond what's already mentioned, I'd like to also add the stuff with WikiProject Rocketry. For example, advertising in mainspace: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Space_Launch_System&diff=1018752805&oldid=1018698148] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SpaceX_Starship&diff=prev&oldid=1018752575], mass pinging others to join the WikiProject ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Neopeius&diff=prev&oldid=1019332929] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:N828335&diff=1019185531&oldid=1018751278] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FinTGM&diff=1018770769&oldid=1018751435]) then being surprised/confused when it didn't work: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:64.121.103.144&oldid=1019702653#Help!_2]. Also, trying to resolve speedy deletions themselves, across many articles: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SLSL_Preseason&diff=prev&oldid=1019550047] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Motor_Vehicles_Tax_in_India&diff=prev&oldid=1019549702] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Motor_Vehicles_Tax_in_India&diff=prev&oldid=1019549439] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fenchuganj_Mohammadia_Kamil_Mad&diff=prev&oldid=1019548939] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mal%C3%A9_Declaration_on_Global_Climate_Change_for_Humanity&diff=prev&oldid=1019548622]. On the other hand I do want to say that for example, putting the current event template on SLS is how I came to this, and when I asked them what was going on ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:64.121.103.144&diff=prev&oldid=1019680150]) they very quickly self-reverted their edit ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Space_Launch_System&diff=1019685280&oldid=1019683175]). To IP: You're being a bit reckless here, you should be more careful. The problem is the combination of inexperience and the confidence to just go for it. I would advise asking someone experienced before making edits that you've never done before nor seen others do before. For everything. For example, if you want to add the "current" template to the top of an article because you think it would apply, I suggest you instead ask someone (e.g. at the Teahouse) when to apply that template, and also if they agree that the template applies to the specific article you want to add it to. This will go over better than just adding it yourself. Then you can work with that in the future and apply it to articles without asking, if you're confident you understand the pattern of how it's used. [[User:Leijurv|Leijurv]] ([[User talk:Leijurv|talk]]) 00:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC) *::I think that [[User:Leijurv]] is understating the concern when they say to 64.121: "You're being a bit reckless here". I think that the unregistered editor is being seriously reckless, and is treating Wikipedia as their electronic playground, which is not what it is for. I said, above, about another editor, that I don't know whether they are a net negative. This editor is definitely a net negative. Having seen the ways listed here that they are making messes, I think that they need a different electronic playground. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 03:50, 25 April 2021 (UTC) : I am going to try to follow suggestions, and try to be better. [[Special:Contributions/64.121.103.144|64.121.103.144]] ([[User talk:64.121.103.144|talk]]) 15:34, 25 April 2021 (UTC) == User: Bilto74811 - Blocked 2 times, given another chance, and disruptive behaviors continue == | |||