Content deleted Content added
Line 1,233: :::::::The grievance list was started by Noteduck 10 Feb. It's almost July and and still being added to. Do you consider 5 months timely? Blanking means little if they note that they can bring the blanked content back (the "blanked" content was added below) and if they keep adding new entries. You claim what I did was similar so lets compare. A specific list in less than a month, used at AE, never used again until blanked when the sandbox was cleaned a month after the AE closed. VS a continuous 5 month list, including many obvious errors, a portion was blanked but in a way that was easy to restore after multiple complaints that the list violated POLEMIC. The accumulation has continued even after several POLEMIC warnings. It's clear Noteduck has decided I've wronged them. To that end they are making a list, following me to continue their grievances at other articles, trying to drum up other editors for support (yourself included) and not trying to claim "but civil POV pusher" rather than reflect on their own actions. If they agree to stop personalizing disputes, MfD the list, and leave me alone all would be fine and we could close this right away. [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 12:31, 26 June 2021 (UTC) ::::::::on the point about leeway: Springee has been editing for more than a decade and has far, far, far more editorial experience than I do. I've only been regularly editing since December 2020 (I have a handful of edits under an old account earlier in 2020). "Springee" gets 98 hits in the [[WP:AN]] archive; "Noteduck" gets 5. Springee should know the rules very well by now - and in fact, Springee does appear to know them when it suits their perspective. There's no reason for Springee to claim ignorance of editorial policy or expect preferential treatment [[User:Noteduck|Noteduck]] ([[User talk:Noteduck|talk]]) 12:42, 26 June 2021 (UTC) :::::::::[[User:Springee|Springee]], I can wipe my sandbox of references to you and any perceived breaches of policy now if you request. I can store it elsewhere if need be. However, you seem to be demanding that I never use my sandbox to build up any sort of allegation involving you again, which I think is pretty unreasonable (and indeed, a total [[WP:POTKETTLE]] situation). On the repeated HOUNDing allegations, please refer more to the specific parts of the policy you feel I am violating, and remember your many posts and 65 hits for "Springee" on my talk page[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Noteduck] don't suggest you are exactly non-adversarial. Per [[WP:HOUND]]: ''{{tq|Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Wikipedia policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles. In fact, such practices are recommended both for Recent changes patrol and WikiProject Spam.}}'' I believe that this is what I've been doing. You've recently pinged me and reverted my edits on the [[Andy Ngo]] page,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Andy_Ngo&diff=1029193859&oldid=1029183756] dragging me away from other Wikipedia projects I enjoy much more: see [[Architecture of Belarus]] and [[Texas Revolution]] [[User:Noteduck|Noteduck]] ([[User talk:Noteduck|talk]]) 12:54, 26 June 2021 (UTC) | |||