Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Line 1,313:

::::In regards to the original statement, I don't think there was cause for such controversy. The original source accurately noted that, "Another significant literary accomplishment of this period was the compilation of the Manyoshu... The Korean influence is also present in the anthology. One of the three main poets of the Manyoshu, Yamanoe Okura, it is now believed, was a Korean immigrant in Japan." The original text being put into the article said, "The poetry of Yamanoe Okura, a Korean who lived in Japan, demonstrates Korean influence on Japanese literature." There was no grounds to claim that any factual inaccuracies or misrepresentation occurred here.[[User:CurtisNaito|CurtisNaito]] ([[User talk:CurtisNaito|talk]]) 03:32, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

*'''Support''' A 6 month ban on ALL Japanese related articles would be acceptable, Hijiri88 has made editing certain Japanese related articles so difficult by his bullying tactics that many editors will no longer edit those articles for fear of being dragged into this type of administrative action. It is not a matter at this point whether Hijiri88 is actually making constructive edits, the constant fighting that accompanies so many of the articles that Hijiri88 edits shows that there is a substantial problem with the manner in which Hijiri88 edits. Many editors have been dragged into prolonged, protracted debates which never should have happened in the first place......unless Hijiri88 is deliberately trying to cause problems which seems to be the case. Now Hijiri88 is running to other editors talk pages trying to drum up support when all of this could have easily been avoided. Using brute force to get your way even if you are right is not how editing is supposed to be done. Hijiri88 seems to get some sort of enjoyment out of drawing unsuspecting editors into one of these types of administrative actions. Even if the other editors are not as knowledgable about a subject it is not acceptable to constantly show how superior your knowledge is. What I do not understand is why Hijiri88 was allowed to continue doing this type of thing for so long. [[Special:Contributions/119.94.99.143|119.94.99.143]] ([[User talk:119.94.99.143|talk]]) 04:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC) <small>— [[User:119.94.99.143|119.94.99.143]] ([[User talk:119.94.99.143|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/119.94.99.143|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small>

*'''Oppose''' - while Hijiri88 can get carried away with CAPS/<u>underline</u>/'''bold'''/''italics''/etc, he shouldn't be topic or page banned. CurtisNaito, who has been misrepresenting sources, should. It was only a few weeks ago that CurtisNaito and TH1980 intentionally baited Hijiri88 to revert them, then turned around and reported him for breaking 3RR. ''That'' is battleground behavior. However, I do agree that Hijiri88's current sandbox should be deleted, as it violates [[WP:POLEMIC]]. '''[[User:Sturmgewehr88|<span style="background:black"><span style="color:red">ミーラー強斗武</span>]]</span>''' ([[User_talk:Sturmgewehr88|StG88ぬ会話]]) 04:55, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

==Question from CuteOrangeKittyCat==