Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 995:

== Vandal-like disruption, aspersions and PAs at [[WP:AVDUCK]] ==

{{trout}}

{{hat|Failure to identify actionable disruptive behavior other than the acusations back and forth themselves. No good is coming of this. Everyone gets a Trout. [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 01:58, 5 August 2015 (UTC)}}

Background: [[WP:Advocacy ducks]] is a relatively new essay, currently rated low impact. Unfortunately, what recently transpired was off the charts, [[WP:POINTY]]. A few editors are now attempting to make a mockery of the essay in a very disruptive, vandal-like fashion which was actually tried once before in the recent past by Quack Guru as evidenced below. The same editors adamantly opposed the essay from day one and tried to prevent it from going into mainspace. Their 3rd attempt failed but they have not dropped the stick. The most disruptive editors of recent events are:

Line 1,524 ⟶ 1,527:

*This is a contender for the silliest (aka [[WP:LAME]]) thread ever. The link to Andy's essay should never have been removed. You folks evidently enjoy arguing with each other. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 01:14, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

:God yes. --[[User:Joel B. Lewis|JBL]] ([[User_talk:Joel_B._Lewis|talk]]) 01:40, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

{hab}}

== Multiple personal attacks by [[user:Harald Forkbeard]] that derail a RfC ==