Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 484:

:::::{{ec}} {{u|Jytdog}} was being less than civil, I'll give you that, but you appear to be assuming bad faith and making personal attacks. <code>&#123;&#123;u&#124;[[User:Zchrykng|zchrykng]]&#125;&#125;&nbsp;^{{[[User talk:Zchrykng|T]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Zchrykng|C]]}}</code> 23:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

:::::: This is just the latest installment of a long series of behaviour, wherein ''only Jytdog is a good enough editor to save Wikipedia from the barbarian horde''. See [[User talk:Cullen328#AfD thing]]. He abuses other editors at an AfD, claims that no-one either will, or is fit to, "save" an article, goes for a fair bit of [[WP:REICHSTAG]] about how ''terrible'' this "spam" article is and how it must be speedied (but just take a look at the size of [[Yakult]] as a company and product). Then when other editors ''do'' start to show an interest in working on it, they're abused, reverted, berated at their own talk: pages and templated like a newbie. Such that then only Jytdog gets to edit the article (lesser editors will just be reverted on sight) and then finally there's a victory parade and round of applause from his fans, because ''only Jytdog was able to save Gotham''. No. This is a collegiate project, and Jytdog needs to learn how to work with others. And that starts by leaving out the scatological abuse. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 07:00, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

* '''Agree''' The incivility from this editor should be obvious from the long list of complaints on his talk page. He had been warned to stop swearing and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=653922604&diffmode=source promised not to continue], yet it continues unabated. <u>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive879#Jytdog:_Protracted_uncivility_and_harrassment] Arbcom unanimously found: "Jytdog has engaged in edit warring, has belittled other editors, and has engaged in non-civil conduct." [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically_modified_organisms#Jytdog]. Arbcom unanimously ruled: "Jytdog is admonished for their poor civility...." [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically_modified_organisms#Jytdog_warned]</u> --[[User:David Tornheim|David Tornheim]] ([[User talk:David Tornheim|talk]]) 23:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC) [revised 01:05, 8 September 2018 (UTC)])

*Andy is all sweaty and exercised, but scurrying to that page to edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yakult&type=revision&diff=858530384&oldid=858425408 badly] and leaving such silly [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AYakult&type=revision&diff=858529994&oldid=858508921 notes] on the talk page don't help create high quality content. It was rather just [[WP:POINTY]] (perfectly so - actually restoring bad and badly sourced, policy-violating content, to make a point).

:Ever since that reprap thing Andy has let themselves get all worked up over me periodically, as they acknowledged [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive920#More_WP:BATTLEGROUND_from_Jytdog_at_Berylliosis here] (and as anyone can see in that thread).