Content deleted Content added
GorillaWarfare 118,263 edits |
Jusdafax 101,692 edits |
||
Line 152: *Update, June 15, 2020 - I am encouraged by the motion, the several additional favorable comments and by David Tornheim's further clarification yesterday, which is clear and precise, with appropriate diffs and reasoning. He exhibits both outstanding patience and prudence during this several month's-long process. A request for adminship lasts a week. His request here has now dragged on for almost a quarter of a year. I submit David Tornheim has more than passed the test, and I salute him and those supporting the end to his years of sanctions. [[User:Jusdafax|Jusdafax]] ([[User talk:Jusdafax|talk]]) 09:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC) ==== Regarding erroneous statements here and elsewhere by [[User:Kingofaces43|Kingofaces43]] ==== I can seldom focus on the walls of text Kingofaces43 posts. Few others here share his views. However, I notice that Kingofaces43 incorrectly states, in his mass of words on this page, that "Jusdafax was also sanctioned." As [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3AJusdafax my log shows I have never been sanctioned] with either topic ban or block. It is true I got an official warning, my one and only, I believe, but a warning is not a [[WP:SANCTION]]. Since it's difficult to believe that Kingofaces43 does not understand the difference between a warning and a sanction, I have to conclude that Kingofaces43's comment regarding my being "sanctioned" is designed to damage my credibility. He has a documented history of doing this. Some examples: Kingofaces43 has [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=962987383 misrepresented others on GMO topics] in just the past few weeks, and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Levivich#GMO_subjects this recent GMO thread] on [[User:Levivich]]'s Talk page makes for interesting reading, starting with Kingofaces43's inappropriate GMO templating of Levivich, and Levivch's strenuous objections. In May, 2019, King was informally admonished by Administrator [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde93]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&type=revision&diff=897413490&oldid=897392084 for this misrepresentation termed "patently untrue"], again on October 29, 2019 for the same behavior [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&type=revision&diff=923642063&oldid=923640262 "You've repeated that erroneous statement here."] and the next day again [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&type=revision&diff=923692711&oldid=923676677 calling King's statement "a misrepresentation."] So, right in front of ArbCom, Kingofaces43 escalates with claims that I have been sanctioned while he accuses me of "just continuing that same pot stirring from old disputes." My diffs show an ongoing pattern from Kingofaces43 of false assertions made with impunity. These are not aspersions I am making, these are stated facts with diffs. The relevance here: I'm extremely concerned about David Tornheim's way forward on GMO's/glyphosate editing per Kingofaces43's open, unrelenting hostility towards editors he disagrees with. King's statement regarding this pending end to David's sanctions as "…stirring up the subject again and ending back up at AE/Arbcom," I take as a threat, and an attempt by Kingofaces43 to lock down a subject he claims special rights to as a steward and curator. ''As the committee prepares to close this request, I suggest King's behavior be noted per the above, and he be formally warned.'' Again, I heartily thank the committee for their deliberations regarding David Tornheim, which have now reached an appropriate and nearly unanimous conclusion. [[User:Jusdafax|Jusdafax]] ([[User talk:Jusdafax|talk]]) 03:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC) === Statement by Capeo === | |||