Content deleted Content added
Line 17: ==Petrarchan47== <nowiki>{{hat|1=No action, at least not in this thread. Other admins remain free to take action. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</span>]]</span></small> 19:48, 16 September 2018 (UTC)}}</nowiki> <small>''This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below. <br />Requests may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.''</small> Line 199: *I don't. The reported diffs are confrontative, but they are mostly about content, not other users. Because no admin has taken action so far, and the thread is being used for what look like pointless recriminations, which I do not intend to read, I'm closing the thread now. {{ping|Drmies}} This does not prevent you from taking action if, unlike me, you believe it is warranted. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</span>]]</span></small> 19:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC) **[[User:Sandstein]], I wonder if that really should be "unlike ''I''"; I invite grammarians to take up this point separately in some other forum. I'm not happy with how this went and how you closed this--if I had been you, I'd have someone else close it. Still, you have a point. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 00:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
:{{Ping|Drmies|Sandstein}} Perhaps sleeping dogs should lie, and feel free to hat/hab this postscript. However, I agree with Drmies and I see concerning conduct in the two most recent diffs. The remaining diffs are rather older and reviewing them may be stretching too far back. By way of context, I note the respondent was a named party to the original case. [[User talk:AGK#top|<span style="color:black;">'''AGK'''</span>]] [[User talk:AGK#top|[•]]] 18:19, 18 September 2018 (UTC) :*{{U|AGK}}, I've looked at all the diffs again. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Monsanto&diff=prev&oldid=859376850 "Sanitize the coverage"] casts aspersions [{{U|MPS1992}}, "sanitize" isn't really neutral]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=856448201 "Your suggestion that the addition of 'negative' information...editing with the goal of protecting Monsanto..."] does likewise, and puts words in other editors' mouths that they never said (though, it should be noted, Tryptofish's comment just above also accuses others of having an agenda). [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlyphosate-based_herbicides&type=revision&diff=859703344&oldid=859699767 "NOTHERE"] is really a ridiculous charge, thus a personal attack. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlyphosate-based_herbicides&type=revision&diff=855363777&oldid=855357987 "May I ask how you happened to turn up and create a brand new page?"]--no you may not; Seraphim System had been glysophating for a week already. I believe these violate the "no casting aspersions" part. These are four recent edits. So, AGK, what do you think? [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC) | |||