Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 347: :{{u|Springee}}, please don't make spurious and misleading allegations. I added a single 14-word sentence to the [[Dennis Prager]] page based on a NY Times article that referred to Prager misrepresenting the seriousness of the COVID-19 pandemic. There weren't any editing restrictions on the page at the time, and nobody has told me that I can't edit while the arb request is ongoing. The edit was reverted on the frankly implausible basis that it was "fake news","misleading, biased and anti-semetic"[sic].[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dennis_Prager&diff=1009002896&oldid=1009002388] I think any reasonable editor would have done the same as I did and restored it [[User:Noteduck|Noteduck]] ([[User talk:Noteduck|talk]]) 00:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC) Hi [[User:Rosguill|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill|''talk'']]</sup> and [[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]], thanks for taking over this matter. Is there a usual timeframe for wrapping up these arb request decisions? Thanks [[User:Noteduck|Noteduck]] ([[User talk:Noteduck|talk]]) 05:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC) Furthermore, I just want to confirm that it's okay to criticize persistent editorial bias and tendentious editing if the editor feels that it's justified, including on talk pages of contested articles when necessary. I'm not sure how else it can be communicated. Cheers [[User:Noteduck|Noteduck]] ([[User talk:Noteduck|talk]]) 00:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC) ====Statement by LokiTheLiar==== | |||