Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Line 681:

**I will however say the first edit is rather trivial though. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 06:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

*** My apologies, Tariq, I mistakenly used the wrong diff for the first revision. The actual diff is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hurva_Synagogue&diff=349072688&oldid=349062171 this] which shows quite extensive changes to that section, most of them directly related to the I/P topic area. [[User:Factsontheground|Factsontheground]] ([[User talk:Factsontheground|talk]]) 06:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

:I was invited to help copyedit an article on the Hurva Synagogue that was up for FA review and the administrator who blocked me said he did not object to my working on that article. I did NOT change information. I edited the lead, and all the material I edited appears in the text of the article. In the article on Israel's foreign relations, again, I did NOT change any material. I just shortened a certain section that was not in proportion to the rest of the sections in the article, and left ALL THE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST ISRAEL exactly as they were. I changed a subheading on relations with Russia to conform with ALL the dozens of other sections, which refer to a main article that is called "X country's relations with Israel." These did not change the political message that Factsonthground is so anxious to convey. Factsontheground is stalking and harassing me (and not only me, as you can see from the numerous administrators' pages that are taken up with his complaints and back and forth reparte, feigning innocence but [[gaming the system]]. Tariqabjotu is also keen on wiping me out of existence, as he didn't like the fact that I added photos to the Israel page which he has effectively claimed as own. The vindictiveness and hostility is growing by the day and users like Factsontheground are playing a major role in turning Wikipedia into a battleground and a forum for their personal agenda. He and his friends, like Supreme Deliciousness, Ani Mejool, and a host of others, are doing all they can to scare away opposition. When administrators let them off lightly without looking at the bulk of contributions, they are perpetuating this and helping to create a laughingstock of Wikipedia, furthering its image and as unreliable source of information. On my part, I will try to stick to copyediting, and improving articles with solid content and references, and illustrating them with attractive pictures. That is what I came to do on Wikipedia, and that is what I hope to continue doing. --[[User:Gilabrand|Gilabrand]] ([[User talk:Gilabrand|talk]]) 09:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

===Result concerning Gilabrand===