Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 22:53, 2 May 2016 edit

Bishonen

(talk | contribs)

Autopatrolled, Administrators

79,416 edits

← Previous edit

Revision as of 22:55, 2 May 2016 edit undo

Dennis Brown

(talk | contribs)

Autopatrolled, IP block exemptions, Administrators

69,056 edits

Next edit →

Line 716:

==Arbitration enforcement action appeal by STSC==

{{hat|1=Appeal declined at this time. The totality of the diffs initially provided were more than adequate to justify the ban and no evidence has been presented to show the ban is no longer needed. [[User:Dennis Brown|Dennis Brown]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|2¢]] 22:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC) }}

''Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Procedures#Enforcement|here]]. According to the procedures, a "clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action. To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see [[WP:UNINVOLVED]]).''

Line 873:

*:{{u|Zujine}} - That would be outside the purview of Arbitration Enforcement. We try to focus on Arb decisions only, as well as any immediate problem that needs attention during the process. Long term problems not related to Arb decisions should be handled at ANI or at DYK or the right venue for that particular problem. [[User:Dennis Brown|Dennis Brown]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|2¢]] 22:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

*Agree with Seraphimblade and Dennis Brown: decline. MarkBernstein's analysis of "the critical edit" above is interesting, and we certainly need to keep in mind that not everybody is a native speaker. But there have been so many other "critical" edits. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 22:53, 2 May 2016 (UTC).

==Jonniefood==