Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Line 576:

<small>''Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. <br>Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.''</small>

====Statement by Nishidani====

See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nishidani#1RR_violation this]. The gravamen of the dispute is that several pages I edit have a standing POV majority, that edits, and reverts, in lockstep. Any one revert by one of them, if challenged, is immediately endorsed by several of the others, and I am told to get consensus. If anyone has a history of writing extensively and exhaustively on IP talk pages to explain the rationale behind her edits, it's me, and it's mainly to no avail. The edit summaries justifying most of these reverts are incomprehensible, fluid, changing from editor to editor, and farcical. The only point is, revert Nishidani on whatever basis you feel like. I challenged a particularly egregious example of false edit summaries at the RSN board https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_222#Jonathan_Ofir_as_translator here. The neutral editors confirmed my argument, yet once I registered the verdict at the [[Al-Dawayima massacre]], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Al-Dawayima_massacre#Restoring_material_after_RSN on the talk page], SJ [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Al-Dawayima_massacre&diff=768672810&oldid=768612127 still held out], insisting I had to get consensus from him and several others editors who consistently revert me. This leads to an impossible working situation where I editor consistently finds himself in a minority. For functionally, 'get consensus' means 'rope in' friendly editors who can outnumber '''us''', otherwise stiff cheddar. This has occurred on a dozen occasions over the past few months. The rules are being subtly gamed. As the evidence on the stub grenade episode shows, it is obviously on a par with Palestinians throwing stones. I always add reports of Palestinian stone throwing where danger or damage occurs, but I am being forbidden, by an irrational ad hoc POV majority, from adding an incident where Israelis threw a stub grenade into a Palestinian's apartment. [[User:Nishidani|Nishidani]] ([[User talk:Nishidani|talk]]) 20:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

====Statement by Debresser====