Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gene Freidman: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 45:

* '''Keep''' - Sufficient sources showing in the footnotes to clear the General Notability Guideline, which asks for multiple pieces of independently published coverage of presumed reliability dealing substantially with the subject of the piece. [[User:Carrite|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite|talk]]) 17:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

::[[User:Carrite]] your !vote made me look at this again, and the article falls apart when you dig into it, like all the little section with "recognition" and "philanthropy" etc. The philanthropy section is cited only to [http://www.rajeusa.com/dinner/Friedman.php this ludicrous] piece of self-puffery for example. And the sockpuppetry going on try to keep this is really quite in-your-face (not taking about you of course). So I don't understand your !vote really. This is just a little piece of overstrained corruption. [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 21:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

:::Jytdog, have you even looked at the history of the article? After 2015, which editors do you think are sockpuppets or paid editors? [[User:World's Lamest Critic|World's Lamest Critic]] ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|talk]]) 21:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC)