Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invidious: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 47:

*'''Keep''' The ''Vice'' and ''Der Spiegel'' articles, along with [https://torrentfreak.com/youtube-orders-invidious-privacy-software-to-shut-down-in-7-days-230609/ this] TorrentFreak article and maybe some of the prior less reliable mentions, seem like a good start, and there may be more coverage of this topic in the near future. I found this article useful for getting a brief overview with links and resources on what seems like a relatively important topic in a niche technology area where reliable sources are less common. I do feel like at this point, especially given the recent controversy, there is a benefit to keeping this article, at least for now. – [[User:Notwally|notwally]] ([[User talk:Notwally|talk]]) 17:41, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

*:I also saw [[TorrentFreak]] coverage, but had not done due diligence. They've been discussed at RSN (unclear consensus), and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=insource%3Atorrentfreak&title=Special%3ASearch&ns0=1 cited hundreds of times]. -- [[User:Yae4|Yae4]] ([[User talk:Yae4|talk]]) 06:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

^'''Comment''' [[Tutanota]] is a competitor in email services (is not impartial), and this has "blog" in the URL, but it looks like

[https://tutanota.com/blog/google-youtube-invidious-privacy-alternative significant coverage] from an independent (AFAIK) source, at least a little better than an average blog. -- [[User:Yae4|Yae4]] ([[User talk:Yae4|talk]]) 06:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)