Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nishat Nawar Salwa: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images
(12 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

===[[:Nishat Nawar Salwa]]===

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. The content has been moved to [[Draft:Nishat Nawar Salwa]]. [[User:Ansh666|ansh]][[User talk:Ansh666|<span style="font-size:80%">''666''</span>]] 20:04, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

===[[:Nishat Nawar Salwa]]===

<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>

:{{la|Nishat Nawar Salwa}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nishat Nawar Salwa|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 June 3#{{anchorencode:Nishat Nawar Salwa}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nishat_Nawar_Salwa Stats]</span>)

Line 35 ⟶ 40:

* '''keep'''--Miss world Bangladesh 2018 1st runner up doesn't means enough for notable, but she is notable as an actress from Bangladesh and has no problem with her source [[User:Anupamofficial|Anupam]] ([[User talk:Anupamofficial|talk]]) 19:36, 02 June 2019 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' None of the "keep" !votes so far gives a policy-based rationale, instead resorting to [[WP:ILIKEIT]] and [[WP:ITSNOTABLE]]. Unless sufficient ''in-depth'' [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] van be unearthed, this most likely will be deleted.<br />

<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Randykitty|Randykitty]] ([[User talk:Randykitty|talk]]) 15:51, 3 June 2019 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Nishat Nawar Salwa]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->

*'''DELETE''' - These citations are awful regardless of how many there are. Celebrity news churn isn't notability. These are trivial mentions, nothing more, e.g. she was named runner-up, she's in a movie yet to be made, she flew to the US (and incidentally, I searched on a NY Bangladesh news site and came up with nothing). Several of the articles merely repeat the same 'news'. The Daily Sun piece looks like it came from an OCR'd copy. [19][24][22] Using ten citations to state that she is getting a role in an upcoming movie doesn't make her a notable actress, nor does using three that mention she was the runner up in a pageant make her notable. First runner-up isn't an award. A seating plan?

:[[WP:NACTOR]] specifies 'multiple notable films' when she doesn't have one yet. [[WP:BASIC]] states that coverage 'must be more than trivial'. [[WP:HITS]] specifies that undue weight should not be given to matters related to popular culture, 'popularity is not notability'. And that some subjects, "…May be on 700 pages and might still not be considered 'existing' enough to show any notability, for Wikipedia's purposes." [[WP:TOOSOON]] Two sentences is not a biography. Give her a chance to actually get her career underway before you try and write it. [[User:Mothman|ogenstein]] ([[User talk:Mothman|talk]]) 06:36, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

* '''Keep'''-- She is notable model and actress. She has also an award. [[User:Jubair Sayeed Linas|Jubair Sayeed Linas]] ([[User talk:Jubair Sayeed Linas|talk]]) 12:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' a failed beauty queen, and not notable in anything else.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 04:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' – First of all, {{u|Johnpacklambert}}, that's a little too harsh of a thing to say about a [[WP:BLP]]. Let's remember the article subjects are innocent victims of our deletion discussions, they don't deserve to be trashed. Coming in second place in one pageant doesn't make a person a "failed beauty queen", anyway. But I agree with JPL here (as I often do) that the article should be deleted. The keep !votes above are highly unconvincing. The number of sources doesn't matter. That she is an actress, even a popular or famous one, also doesn't matter. "Cult following" isn't automatic notability, either. Many of the keep !votes have very low edit counts and perhaps do not fully understand Wikipedia's notability guidelines, which I hope the closer pays attention to. The article is [[WP:REFBOMB]]ed, but going through the sources, including the foreign-language ones with Google Translate, I see not one single source that would count as [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] sufficient to meet [[WP:BASIC]]. They all seem to be passing mentions. Unless someone can demonstrate [[WP:THREE]] examples of sources that would meet BASIC, this article should be deleted. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">– [[User:Levivich|Leviv]]<span style="display:inline-block;position:relative;transform:rotate(45deg);bottom:-.57em;">[[User Talk:Levivich|ich]]</span></span> 05:07, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' When I hear “runner-up” I hear “un-notable”. If you didn’t win, you didn’t win! Nothing to write about then. [[User:Trillfendi|Trillfendi]] ([[User talk:Trillfendi|talk]]) 15:42, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

* {{comment}} '''{{ping|DGG}}''' '''I think the article was important enough, since [[WP:GNG]] has not passed. That's why I want to draft this page. This article may be deleted, but i hope after the next six months or a year, it will be re-registered any others Bangladeshi contributor again because she is known as actress form Bangladesh. when released of her two Bangladeshi films, I think this article will be acceptable for notable.'''--'''[[User:NahalAhmed|Nahal]]''' ([[User talk:NahalAhmed|talk]]) 15:07, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>