Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nishat Nawar Salwa: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 42:

* '''Keep'''-- She is notable model and actress. She has also an award. [[User:Jubair Sayeed Linas|Jubair Sayeed Linas]] ([[User talk:Jubair Sayeed Linas|talk]]) 12:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' a failed beauty queen, and not notable in anything else.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 04:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' – First of all, {{u|Johnpacklambert}}, that's a little too harsh of a thing to say about a [[WP:BLP]]. Let's remember the article subjects are innocent victims of our deletion discussions, they don't deserve to be trashed. Coming in second place in one pageant doesn't make a person a "failed beauty queen", anyway. But I agree with JPL here (as I often do) that the article should be deleted. The keep !votes above are highly unconvincing. The number of sources doesn't matter. That she is an actress, even a popular or famous one, also doesn't matter. "Cult following" isn't automatic notability, either. Many of the keep !votes have very low edit counts and perhaps do not fully understand Wikipedia's notability guidelines, which I hope the closer pays attention to. The article is [[WP:REFBOMB]]ed, but going through the sources, including the foreign-language ones with Google Translate, I see not one single source that would count as [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] sufficient to meet [[WP:BASIC]]. They all seem to be passing mentions. Unless someone can demonstrate [[WP:THREE]] examples of sources that would meet BASIC, this article should be deleted. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">– [[User:Levivich|Leviv]]<span style="display:inline-block;position:relative;transform:rotate(45deg);bottom:-.57em;">[[User Talk:Levivich|ich]]</span></span> 05:07, 5 June 2019 (UTC)