Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prabhloch Singh (2nd nomination) - Wikipedia

Article Images

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was deleted before per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prabhloch Singh and recreated very soon but issues are still same.

Still fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. Only one particular editor has so far edited this article who also happens to be the creator, and this is alone suspicious. I have also nominated the article of his non-notable organization (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle Finger Protests), who's article was also created by the same editor. Capitals00 (talk) 06:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:08, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:08, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:08, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article was reviewed and accepted. Having few editors shouldn't be a reason for suspicion. It has very credible sources. The subject is notable, so is his org. I would request you to reconsider. I'm not a wiki wizard like you, I really appreciate your perspective and time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThisMr (talk • contribs) 08:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

You are clearly ignoring the in depth coverage of the individual and the org by reliable, credible sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThisMr (talk • contribs) 13:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC) ThisMr (talk) 13:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Above user is the creator of the article and has canvassed.[1] Anmolbhat (talk) 15:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I am not 100% convinced of the notability of the person independently of the organisation. If the content about the org is removed, and the sources that are primarily about the organisation (only mentioning Singh's name) are discounted, what remains is a bit thin. I still think it's just on the "keep" side of the notability threshold, but I could be convinced that it is not. If deleted, it should be merged and redirected to Middle Finger Protests. --bonadea contributions talk 13:36, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you at least provide sources that made you think the article should be kept? I see none. Organization and him, both are non-notable. Anmolbhat (talk) 15:51, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing changed since previous AFD, still a non-notable individual with no major coverage in independent sources and this comes after years of existence on Wikipedia. Notify Reddogsix, the nominator of previous AFD. Anmolbhat (talk) 15:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at these sources:

http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/life-style/giving-the-dead-their-dignity/496529.html http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/life-style/gyan-zone/world-of-activism/377908.html http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/People-were-afraid-to-protest-against-Manu/articleshow/7273856.cms (this was the front page of TOI main edition) https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/school-bus-attack-in-gurugram-if-they-get-away-this-will-happen-again-says-petitioner/articleshow/62666776.cms

There are more sources that can be quoted if required. ThisMr (talk) 17:46, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]