Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Ruzan - Wikipedia


Article Images
Robin Ruzan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not independently notable, notability isn't inherited through marriage Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:25, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I was thinking it'd be an easy keep except after looking at the actual article I don't see where there's the sufficient notability. There are some executive producer credits, and I expected to find more searching but the only obvious hit I found was a People mag [3] article about the divorce. I'm having trouble finding any coverage that isn't directly tied to Meyers. While we have to be careful about over stepping inherited notability, it's still an important concept. Aside from the Streaming network link, every link on the first page of the google search Schmidt links to is a reference to either the marriage or the divorce. Shadowjams (talk) 21:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Robin Ruzan is well known independent of her spouse's fame. Actors and artistic performers should not be deleted by armchair critics who have no personal knowledge or have actually seen them perform. Rather than deletionism why not try to improve the content or reach out to the contributors by obtaining more information? Just exactly who are the people who want to control all the articles in this subject area?

PsychClone (talk) 23:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]