Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Davidson - Wikipedia


Article Images

Delete Person of very little importance Spotteddogsdotorg 18:40, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete Do we need every damn airhead anchor from podunk's bio here? No! Hohokus 23:19, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Local TV gal in small market - not notable! Melvis 17:30, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete WHO? Not notable! Next! ShureMicGuy 19:07, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. An actual informative article of a large city (Philadelphia is not podunk) tv anchor might earn a weak keep from me as mostly harmless, but the definition-like stublet does not. -- Infrogmation 02:38, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete: A fact, not an article. As for the notability of news readers from mid-market cities, I, personally, would not think them tremendously significant, as they change rapidly and move even more rapidly. A local institution in mid-market media might be alright. Geogre 03:05, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, passes WP:BIO. Kappa 04:58, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, significant enough. astiquetalk 05:21, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, does not pass WP:BIO. She's neither a "widely recognized entertainment personality" nor a "well-known entertainment figure". Nobody outside Philadelphia is likely to have heard of her, and I'd guess that many residents of the city wouldn't recognize her name. --Smack (talk) 05:33, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Television personalities from major cities are notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 05:35, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand. Has some notability. JamesBurns 05:53, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't see a local TV personality as being notable in most cases. --Xcali 06:00, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Seems to be notable enough for me. And she would be "widely recognised" and "well known" in Philadelphia. Leithp 10:24, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Just because someone is on TV in one city on one station doesn't mean that they are "widely recognised" and "well known" even in their own city, let alone their own country. They have done no national TV work, so they are still not notable, which is why I still say Delete! Spotteddogsdotorg 14:53, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)