Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whale watching in Brazil: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Line 32:

::* I did look at the NZ article and I have looked again at it. It still think it is WikiTravel material. A link to there could be on [[Whale watching]]. WMF has many projects. Not everything fits wikipedia. Some stuff should be on other projects. --[[User:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''Bduke'''</span>]] [[User_talk:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''(Discussion)'''</span>]] 08:43, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

*'''Comment''' Considering the fact that only the NZ article has been improved, and all the other ten were ''and'' are simply copy pastes from Whale watching, only the the NZ article may be considered for keeping. --[[User:Fauzan|<font color="2F4F4F"> Fauzan</font>]]<sup style="margin-left:+0.5ex">[[User talk:Fauzan#top|<font color="BDB76B">✆ talk</font>]]</sup> <sub style="margin-left:-5.35ex">[[Special:EmailUser/Fauzan|<font color="BDB76B">✉ email</font>]]</sub> 07:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

*'''[[WP:NOTCLEANUP|AfD is not cleanup]]. The fact that the NZ article has been improved shows that the nom did not do a proper [[WP:BEFORE]] check and that this whole blanket nomination is flawed. -- [[Special:Contributions/101.117.108.195|101.117.108.195]] ([[User talk:101.117.108.195|talk]]) 22:40, 1 May 2014 (UTC)