Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 68:

::Articles need to built based on credible, independent sources and should use sparingly, if at all, any citations to the org's website. In order to qualify for an article, there must be at least two, in-depth profile stories in credible, independent sources. Contributing with a COI is not forbidden, but it is discouraged, because in almost all cases the editor ends up with a distorted view of what is neutral and notable. [[User:CorporateM|CorporateM]] ([[User_talk:CorporateM|Talk]]) 15:55, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

:::Agree with [[User:CorporateM|CorporateM]] and, for the most part, [[User:Alexbrn|Alexbrn]]. I'm guessing this topic could be significant enough to justify an article, but we need more, better sources and a little polishing up of the content itself. I'd offered to go over this material in the past (hadn't noticed this conversation till now or I'd have said something before), [[user:SAS81|SAS81]], so I'll look into it, try to address these issues and, unless anyone has an issue with me doing so, submit the article for consideration. Seems that's a resolution to the COI, sourcing and content issues. Thoughts? [[User:Askahrc|The Cap'n]] ([[User talk:Askahrc|talk]]) 20:17, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

== Northwestern Michigan College ==