Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2018 February 9: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

* '''[[:Adria Airways destinations]]''' – '''Overturn to keep.''' By a wide margin, the AfD close is overturned. Even after identifying a few users who edit mostly in the airline space and discounting their arguments as biased, there's an strong consensus here to overturn. And, of the people who argued for a specific alternative, there's clear consensus that it should be overturned to keep, as opposed to NC.

:The primary issue here was that the close basically said, ''Policy was already established at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&oldid=823074541#Should_Wikipedia_have_and_maintain_complete_lists_of_airline_destinations? a Village Pump / Policy discussion], and that trumps the consensus of the people discussing the issue here at AfD''. That concept was soundly rejected in this review. – -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 15:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

::PS, I haven't chased down all the collateral fallout of template cleanup. If folks could take care of those as they find them, I'd appreciate it. -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 16:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

| style="text-align:center;" | ''The following is an archived debate of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the page above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>''

| style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" |

:{{DRV links|Adria Airways destinations|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adria Airways destinations|article=}}

I'm starting this DRV following the suggestion made by {{u|Spartaz}} in their closure. The AfD follows the closure of a discussion held at AN, in which the closure of a VP discussion was challenged. All the relevant links are included in this [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adria Airways destinations|AfD discussion]]. '''[[User:Jetstreamer|Jetstreamer]]''' ''{{sup|[[User talk:Jetstreamer#top|Talk]]}}'' 20:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Line 200 ⟶ 211:

::::[[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] -- I am happy to contribute to articles (a) that I feel are fundamentally useful to a reader of the encyclopedia and (b) are not a sink of editing effort. I give as an example [[American Eagle Airlines destinations]] whose retention you defend. This article would require a monthly review of over a hundred entries every month to keep it up to date. It gets fifteen page views a day. The editing effort (in time) will likely exceed the reading time. How useful is that? Nevertheless, I am the most active editor on that article since this debate reignited. [[User:Rhadow|Rhadow]] ([[User talk:Rhadow|talk]]) 18:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

:::::[[User:Rhadow|Rhadow]], is there any way I can convince you to stop AfDing these articles until this discussion is over, and possibly withdraw them from deletion for the time being? At the moment we're having this rather contentious discussion over several different places, and it would be best to consolidate the discussion at the moment. The same arguments we saw here are starting to be made over at the American Eagle AfD article, and you're even editing an article you AfD'd! Also, I think you overestimate the amount of time needed to reference these articles to keep them current. We don't need to review over the references of over a hundred entries a month, especially considering it's a binary list. Thanks! [[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] ([[User talk:SportingFlyer|talk]]) 19:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

| style="text-align:center;" | ''The above is an archive of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the page listed in the heading. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>''

====[[:Rahul Verma (social activist)]] (closed)====