Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 July 14: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Content deleted Content added
m |
|||
Line 586: * '''Comment''' Is it time to close this now? All the arguments have been stated. As an AP photograph, it has a commercial purpose - driving page views on news websites - and I think Wikipedia should come to a decision quickly about whether our use of it does show due respect for the commerical opportunities for the copyright holder, and all of the other nine [[WP:NFCCP]] criteria. [[User:Hallucegenia|Hallucegenia]] ([[User talk:Hallucegenia|talk]]) 21:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC) *'''Keep''' as fair use for the article [[Trump raised-fist photographs]] as the image in question lit is the subject of the article. - [[User:Knowledgekid87|Knowledgekid87]] ([[User talk:Knowledgekid87|talk]]) 22:50, 16 July 2024 (UTC) *'''Keep''', falls under the fair use doctrine. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:George_Floyd_neck_knelt_on_by_police_officer.png or even the Trump mugshot, which were both kept under fair use. Why not this one? [[Historyexpert2]] <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Historyexpert2|Historyexpert2]] ([[User talk:Historyexpert2#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Historyexpert2|contribs]]) 02:28, 17 July 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> <!-- Please comment ABOVE this line --> {{reflist-talk}} | |||