Content deleted Content added
Line 99: :::::::Typically allowed, yes. However, when an editor names an essay after themselves, coupled with said editor's ownership of that essay, that is not one those instances, imo. When that happens, such an essay belongs in the editor's user space, because it is not a "typical" essay. - [[User:SudoGhost|Sudo]][[User_talk:SudoGhost#top|Ghost]] 22:21, 9 November 2012 (UTC) * '''Userfy''' per Wnt. Cheers.--''<font face="bold">[[User:Wikiwind|<span style="background:#633B7E;color:#FFD550;padding:0 2px">В и к и</span>]][[User talk:Wikiwind|<span style="background:#FFD666;padding:0 2px;color:#0000;"> T </span>]]</font> 12:05, 9 November 2012 (UTC) :::::::jc37, aka Jclemens, has omitted a chunk from the "debate tactics". Here is the full version: ''Attack your "opponent", and force them into a "defensive" stance, where they must repeatedly respond/defend themselves; meanwhile frame a specious "law" (name it after yourself so that its, ahem, ownership is clear), and use it to trump up the charge that your "opponent", having had to repeat the verbiage of their argument in the face of your deliberate evasions, misrepresentations and IDHT, is ipso facto in the wrong.'' I'm pretty sure I've seen an editor employ this tactic, but I can't quite remember who it was. [[User:Writegeist|Writegeist]] ([[User talk:Writegeist|talk]]) 23:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC) | |||