Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Lourdes 2: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 295:

#::The only way to estimate how much someone is inclusionist is to compare their actual !votes on a sampling of AfDs with either your estimate of what a correct !vote would have been or what the actual !votes in the AfD have been. (That's what CT has done.) You might argue about whether the results of that methodology really prove a certain degree of inclusionism, whether that degree is "too much", whether the sampling of AfDs was fairly taken and well analyzed, but your stat ain't a decent counterargument on its own. </rant> [[User:Tigraan|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;color:#008000;">Tigraan</span>]]^{[[User talk:Tigraan|<span title="Send me a silicium letter!" style="color:">Click here to contact me</span>]]} 11:40, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

#:::{{re|Tigraan}} Chris thankfully showed me that my comment was possibly too compressed to be understood. I replied to him on [[User talk:SoWhy|my talk page]]. You are welcome to participate as well. Regards [[User:SoWhy|<b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b>]] 12:33, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

#:::{{ec}} Without people using the exact words, I was criticized for being both too inclusionist and too deletionist in my RfA (which I'm sure gave SoWhy a laugh {{wink}}): whether someone is a deletionist or inclusionist in RfA-speak typically means "where do they stand on a particular set of articles that I have opinions on". I've never seen Lourdes as an arch-inclusionist or ARS-type. Her percentages come off that way (57% is a low deletion percentage as most AfDs close delete), but it's because she makes reasonable arguments to keep and always does BEFORE. I've also seen her argue quite strongly for deletion in a reasonable and respectful way. I think she'll have a pragmatic approach to deletion, which I see as a positive: on the flip side, it also means that she'll likely face criticism for closes when people who are on the far end of either side of the spectrum disagree with her: I think she can handle it, and that she'll likely be correct most of the time. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 12:52, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

=====Neutral=====