Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rainbowwarrior1977: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 26:

#::I'd like to see a policy citation for this claim. Do you have one? -- [[User:Essjay|Essjay]] · [[User_talk:Essjay| Talk]] 18:17, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

#:::If [[User:Essjay|Essjay]] didn't take it down, someone else would have. It shouldn't matter who took it down. We all can see this has gone on long enough. This is no need for you to experience further humiliation. [[User:Acetic Acid|Ryan]] 18:21, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

#::::Even if the nomination was in good faith, if it clearly fails, it can be removed. From the top of the requests section " Nominations which will clearly fail may be removed earlier to prevent discussions that generate ill will; however, as most editors don't visit Wikipedia daily, a reasonable amount of time should be allowed. Some users oppose early removal under any circumstances. If your nomination is rejected, please wait a reasonable period of time before applying again (say, a month)." [[User:Zscout370|Zscout370]] [[User_talk:Zscout370|(Sound Off)]] 18:23, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

'''Neutral'''

#