Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Thumperward 2: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 116:

#'''Support''' - good answers and will be an asset with the admin tools. --[[User:CapitalR|CapitalR]] ([[User talk:CapitalR|talk]]) 00:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

#'''Support''' - concerns raised by opposition are not in areas that this editor intends to admin; and no, some content conflict with Jimbo over something that [[Linux_naming_controversy|is controversial]] isn't a reason to oppose in my view (is Jimbo the ultimate content decider?) The candidate is more trustworthy than [[WP:Huggle]] plug-ins that get the mop in a blink despite the lack of substantive edits. [[User:Xasodfuih|Xasodfuih]] ([[User talk:Xasodfuih|talk]]) 00:55, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

#:Is Jimbo the ultimate content decider? The answer is yes. Fortunately, unlike many people I've worked for, he takes a Socratic/Rand philosophy to running the show. We have the power, except when we don't, and that's fine by us. [[User:Keegan|<font color="maroon">Keegan</font>]]^{<small>[[User talk:Keegan|<font color="gray">talk</font>]]</small>} 04:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

#'''Support''' - per MSGJ. [[user:Ascidian | <font color="blue" face="arial narrow">ascidian</font>]] |[[user talk:Ascidian | <font color="green" face="arial narrow">talk-to-me</font>]] 05:43, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

#<font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="3">[[User:Coldmachine|Coldmachine]]</font>^{<small>[[User talk:Coldmachine|Talk]]</small>} 17:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC)