Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 63:

// END TEMPLATE - copy text above (not this line) // -->

<!-- ADD CASE BELOW NEW REQUESTS AT THE TOP-->

=== New anti-Semitism ===

: '''Initiated by ''' [[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] '''at''' 02:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

==== Involved parties ====

* {{admin|Tony Sidaway}}

* {{admin|Jayjg}}

* {{admin|SlimVirgin}}

* {{admin|Bastique}}

; Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request

; Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried

* Seems to be a huge amount of bad blood over editing on the article [[New anti-Semitism]]. Perhaps arbitration would be advisable in order to forestall further ugliness.

==== Statement by [[User:Tony Sidaway]] ====

I'm not really involved in this but I'm sure I'm not the only one seeing some extremely ugly interactions between some of my colleagues, all of whom are extremely highly respected members of the community. In my limited perception and experience the dispute seems to revolve around perceived ownership issues over this article. Jayjg and SlimVirgin have put a tremendous amount of effort into this article but there seems to be a widespread and possibly defensible perception that they are permitting their personal biases to intrude into the editing. Because of personal criticism on the basis of this perception, interactions have become rather unfriendly. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 02:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

==== Statement by party 2 ====

: (Please limit your statement to 500 words. Overlong statements may be removed without warning by clerks or arbitrators and replaced by much shorter summaries. Remember to sign and date your statement.)

==== Clerk notes ====

: (This area is used for notes by non-recused clerks.)

==== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0) ====

----

=== Emil Kraepelin ===