Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Davenbelle and Stereotek: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 82:

''Stereotek's response to Coolcat's claims regarding my edits in specific articles''

*Coolcats comments regarding my edits in the [[abortion]] article are simply not true. The conflict started when he replaced the previously well written prose in several sections with a unorganized collection of bullets. I started my work restoring the prose in the sections with this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abortion&diff=15329245&oldid=15328828] using the edit summary "see talk". I mentioned my concerns about his on the aticles talkpage [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAbortion&diff=15328776&oldid=15328772], and the other editors that commented there mostly agreed with my concerns. However, Coolcat refused to discusse his edit, and didn't leave any messages on the talkpage. Coolcat's only response to the concerns that I raised on the articles talk page was a revert with the editsummary "sockpuppet edits..." [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abortion&diff=15355360&oldid=15354739].

*In the '[[Antiwar.com]]' Coolcats first action was to list the more than half a year old article for speedy deletion [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antiwar.com&diff=15281648&oldid=15280702], and delete all the internal links pointing to that article. I removed the speedy deletion tag mentioned my concerns on the talk page and asked Coolcat to list the article on VfD instead [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Antiwar.com&oldid=15281760]