Wikipedia talk:Article titles: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 479:

: Thank you. Exactly. Believe it or not, that bit is all that is at issue here (I think some other changes - inconsequential tweaks - also got mixed into the reverts), and it sure seemed straight-forward to me. --[[User:Born2cycle|Born2cycle]] ([[User talk:Born2cycle|talk]]) 09:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

:(ec) Ah, sorry, just noticed the link to the archived discussion given above, so the change wasn't entirely accidental. But still I don't think the 2/3 editors who made that change really understood the intent of the wording that was removed. We don't add stuff to article titles to try to make them recognizable even to people who are ignorant of the subject (we don't say [[Fred Smith (actor, you know, the fat one on Eastenders)]], or anything like that).--[[User:Kotniski|Kotniski]] ([[User talk:Kotniski|talk]]) 09:23, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

::There is simply no need for haste of that sort. Obviously, the matter is sensitive through and through. Nothing is lost by ''waiting''. I have restored the version that was in place for many months, until a few hours ago. Now, let's see some testing of consensus. When (and if) there is consensus to change the text of the crucial wording of a main principle in policy, we can agree to do it.

::<font color="blue"><big>N</big><small>oetica</small></font>^{<small>[[User_talk:Noetica |Tea?]]</small>} 09:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)