Wikipedia talk:Dispute resolution noticeboard: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 98:

:::A refiling of this case will only result in another close. Forgetting about the canvassing issue.......... I counted 14 editors involved in the one discussion thread. ReallyFatB says there were other editors in other threads. That means a 'proper' DRN filing would include up to 20 participants. It would be absurd and pointless and outside the scope of DRN which is defined as "an informal place to resolve small content disputes." T-Man, Hasteur and myself have all stated that an RfC is the appropriate action in this instance. However, ReallyFatB (RFB) seems to be saying there has already been a consensus on the talk page and an RfC will have the same undesirable result. So it appears RFB is [[WP:FORUM| Forum Shopping]] for a preferred result. Sorry, but that is not how WP works. Bottom line is this dispute will not be heard here at DRN. Please explore your other options at [[WP:DR]] and [[WP:DRR]].--<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — [[User:Keithbob|<b style= "color:#085;"><i>Keithbob</i></b>]] • [[User_ talk:Keithbob|<span style="color:#035;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 13:03, 3 July 2014 (UTC) (DRN Vounteer Coordinator)

::::This is one of those times I do disagree. I do feel the party should be allowed to re-file, reword and re-think the dispute. Now, I am also not aware of any participation limit. What are too many editors? Many will likely decline and some may not even really be a part of the dispute. But as always I defer to consensus.--[[User:Mark Miller|Mark Miller]] ([[User talk:Mark Miller|talk]]) 22:26, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

==Editor Denisona out of control==

This is the second time Denisona has randomly deleted strictly accurate and duly sourced material from an article.

This time, I added it back with the proper attribution ''and'' a statement that some authorities (to wit, Denisona) seem to disagree.

I see that I am FAR FROM the only person who has had issues with this person, for whom Denisova is a more appropriate moniker, if you get the pun . . .

What to do? I am tired of obnoxious three-day bans and such because I disagree with editors who take it upon themselves to be capricious, subjective, and, above all, asinine.

[[Special:Contributions/50.128.184.140|50.128.184.140]] ([[User talk:50.128.184.140|talk]]) 15:20, 5 July 2014 (UTC)