Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Liz/Bureaucrat discussion: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 138: :::No, but we do require that they be lawyers and have training in the law. You don't take a baby lawyer, straight out of law school, and make them a judge. Even where judges are elected there are limits, like in Texas, where a trial court judge must have been a lawyer for 4 years to run, an appellate court judge for 10 years. That's the experience, not whether they have been a criminal or not. <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">[[User:GregJackP|<span style="color:#900;font-size:110%;font-family:Mistral">GregJackP</span>]] [[User talk:GregJackP|<span style="color:#900;font-size:60%">Boomer!</span>]]</span> 17:59, 4 August 2015 (UTC) ::::Wait{{emdash}}baby lawyers can't become admins? Won't someone please think of the children!- [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 18:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC) :::::I agree with GregJackP; it is good to have some admins who have experience in writing content, and who have at least one GA or more. Although I supported Liz because my concerns about content were made up for by her diligent work on ANI, fighting vandalism, etc., I would have liked it better if she did have some more content work. [[User:Spaghetti07205|Spaghetti07205]] ([[User talk:Spaghetti07205|talk]]) 18:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC) | |||