Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 04:06, 12 April 2010 edit

UnqstnableTruth

(talk | contribs)

Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers

40,741 edits

← Previous edit

Revision as of 04:07, 12 April 2010 edit undo

UnqstnableTruth

(talk | contribs)

Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers

40,741 edits

Next edit →

Line 235:

*'''"Comment'''- I reopened the discussion. We can't go around closing discussions when opposition is clearly visible. I for one agree with Gary. Per [[WP:DISAMBIGUATION]], if "an article title could refer to several things" than further disambiguation is necessary. This automatically rules out "Kane (wrestler)" as a possible name. '''''[[User:Raaggio|Raa]][[Special:Contributions/Raaggio|<big><big>G</big></big>]][[User:Raaggio/Guest Book|gio]] [[User talk:Raaggio|(talk)]]''''' 03:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

*The "There are two wrestlers known as Kane so it needs to be more specific" '''IS''' bunk, Stevie Ray was Kane for a very short time as part of Harlem Heat's first six to eight months in WCW, a hat note is more than sufficient - the "WWE Wrestler" would only be necessary if the other article shared a name, it does not - a hat note is more than sufficient and it allows the article to be at the much simpler name "Kane (wrestler)" with a note on top for the 1 in 3 million who may be looking for Stevie Ray after waking up from a 17-year long coma. Also see [[WP:DISAMBIGUATION]], third point under "Deciding to disambiguate" it states ''"The page at [[Michael Dobbs]] is about the primary topic, and there is only one other use. The other use is linked directly using a hatnote; no disambiguation page is needed."'' and in the example the articles actually share names, this isn't even the case here. So I'm sorry but throwing the "Disambig" rules around actually supports the "Kane (wrestler)" with a hat note supporters. [[User:MPJ-DK|''' MPJ ''']][[User talk:MPJ-DK|-DK ]] 03:46, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

**Then we're good. Just because two users oppose this ~~deosn~~doesn't mean a consensus can't be determined, especially when the opposition clearly is the minority. No one ever 100% agrees with everthing... and yet we still get a consensus. Done. --[[User:3bulletproof16|'''Unquestionable''']][[User talk:3bulletproof16|'''Truth''']]-- 04:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC)