Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit) | false |
Edit count of the user (user_editcount) | 12451 |
Name of the user account (user_name) | 'Prokaryotes' |
Age of the user account (user_age) | 135536069 |
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups) | [
0 => 'extendedconfirmed',
1 => '*',
2 => 'user',
3 => 'autoconfirmed'
] |
Rights that the user has (user_rights) | [
0 => 'extendedconfirmed',
1 => 'createaccount',
2 => 'read',
3 => 'edit',
4 => 'createtalk',
5 => 'writeapi',
6 => 'editmyusercss',
7 => 'editmyuserjs',
8 => 'viewmywatchlist',
9 => 'editmywatchlist',
10 => 'viewmyprivateinfo',
11 => 'editmyprivateinfo',
12 => 'editmyoptions',
13 => 'abusefilter-view',
14 => 'abusefilter-log',
15 => 'abusefilter-log-detail',
16 => 'centralauth-merge',
17 => 'vipsscaler-test',
18 => 'ep-bereviewer',
19 => 'collectionsaveasuserpage',
20 => 'reupload-own',
21 => 'move-rootuserpages',
22 => 'move-categorypages',
23 => 'createpage',
24 => 'minoredit',
25 => 'purge',
26 => 'sendemail',
27 => 'applychangetags',
28 => 'ep-enroll',
29 => 'mwoauthmanagemygrants',
30 => 'reupload',
31 => 'upload',
32 => 'move',
33 => 'collectionsaveascommunitypage',
34 => 'autoconfirmed',
35 => 'editsemiprotected',
36 => 'movestable',
37 => 'autoreview',
38 => 'transcode-reset',
39 => 'skipcaptcha'
] |
Global groups that the user is in (global_user_groups) | [] |
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile) | false |
Page ID (page_id) | 46375643 |
Page namespace (page_namespace) | 3 |
Page title without namespace (page_title) | 'Jdcomix' |
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle) | 'User talk:Jdcomix' |
Last ten users to contribute to the page (page_recent_contributors) | [
0 => 'Prokaryotes',
1 => 'Jdcomix',
2 => 'LM2000',
3 => '2001:8003:117E:6D00:433:304F:CC39:2D5F',
4 => 'Zawl',
5 => 'SineBot',
6 => '2001:8003:117E:6D00:A0C4:8FED:ECAD:1157',
7 => '2001:8003:117E:6D00:3158:C98E:9652:EA0D',
8 => 'Yellow Evan',
9 => 'Unscintillating'
] |
Action (action) | 'edit' |
Edit summary/reason (summary) | '/* Your fringe claim at Hurricane Harvey */ ' |
Old content model (old_content_model) | 'wikitext' |
New content model (new_content_model) | 'wikitext' |
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext) | '{{talk header|bottom=no|disclaimer=no|wp=no|display_title=custom page title|arpol=no|noarchive=no|search=|User talk:Jdcomix/Archive 1}}
== Gamergate discretionary sanctions notification ==
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''
'''Please carefully read this information:'''
The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate|here]].
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Woodroar|Woodroar]] ([[User talk:Woodroar|talk]]) 17:10, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
:Saw this earlier, already adhering to the restrictions (already made my 1 revert for today). Thanks, though. :) [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 17:11, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
== Thanks ==
Read your reasoned plea for more neutrality on the Anita Sarkeesian article, together with the biased stonewall you immediately and predictably encountered. Just wanted to offer my thanks for having the courage to wade into an incredibly and alarmingly frustrating corner of wikipedia. Here's hoping that one day senior editors can amass the courage to deal with the army of worker bees who pounce on any effort to bring more neutrality to so obviously one-sided articles, such as Sarkeesian's. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/172.79.83.92|172.79.83.92]] ([[User talk:172.79.83.92#top|talk]]) 05:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Their arguments against it were fair, though. The media is obviously biased for Sarkeesian, so there's no good sources criticizing her. [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 14:36, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
== Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Donald_Trump—CNN_beating_video ==
In [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Donald_Trump%E2%80%93CNN_beating_video]] your close was against the raw vote count without an explanation. This would a controversial close even for an admin, and non-admins should not be making controversial closes, so please revert your close. Thank you, [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 14:14, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
:What? The consensus was to redirect/merge. That's what the consensus was, and they provided the best arguements. However, I did !vote on it, so I'll revert the close. If you want to close it for the same reason, feel free to, though. Have a nice day. :) [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 14:35, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
== Franklin 17 ==
Why did you do a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hurricane_Franklin_(2017)&curid=54790413&diff=794760828&oldid=794754758 cut/paste move]? To preserve page history and for the reasons given at [[WP:ATTREQ]], those are not allowed. Wait for an admin to move it. [[User:Yellow Evan|Y]][[User talk:Yellow Evan|E]] <font color="#66666"><sup>[[2017 PHS|Pacific]]</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Yellow Evan|<sup>Hurricane</sup></font>]] 22:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
== what do i do ==
what do i do when i noticed that all of wikis expert sources are wrong about the altleft article then they stop me cause its original reasearch
but i have primary sources that prove my case? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:117E:6D00:3158:C98E:9652:EA0D|2001:8003:117E:6D00:3158:C98E:9652:EA0D]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:117E:6D00:3158:C98E:9652:EA0D#top|talk]]) 17:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== altleft ==
https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/08/18/proposal-for-an-alternative-left/ https://altleft.com/ https://www.reddit.com/r/AlternativeLeft/ <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:117E:6D00:A0C4:8FED:ECAD:1157|2001:8003:117E:6D00:A0C4:8FED:ECAD:1157]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:117E:6D00:A0C4:8FED:ECAD:1157#top|talk]]) 21:39, 21 August 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Appreciate the good faith effort to find some sources, but wordpress isn't a reliable source. Thanks. :) [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 01:07, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
but to quote the wiki editors
'''and, since there seem to be not actual self-identifying adherents,'''
and "there is no alt left"
but i found people who since 2015 have been a group and calling themselves the alternative left and the editors just ignore it, one even said that it was satire i mean i have the truth here and its ignored please read the links read them
[[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:117E:6D00:433:304F:CC39:2D5F|2001:8003:117E:6D00:433:304F:CC39:2D5F]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:117E:6D00:433:304F:CC39:2D5F|talk]]) 00:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guns of Boom]] ==
Hey there.<br />
Your NAC of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guns of Boom|the Guns of Boom AfD]] appears to be an [[WP:BADNAC|inappropriate closure]], as the outcome is a close call or controversial, and should be better left to an admin. Would you please undo your closure and allow an admin to close it? — <span style="background:#0F4D92;color:white;padding:1px 10px;">[[User:Zawl|<span style="color:white;font-variant:Small-caps;">'''Za'''</span>]][[User talk:Zawl|<span style="color:white;font-variant:Small-caps;">'''wl'''</span>]]</span> 19:09, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
:I reverted your closure of the Roman Reigns debate. You really need to read these AfDs before closing them after just glancing at the !votes. You also need to provide rationale for why you closed it the way you did, especially when the !vote is close. Best to leave the really close ones up to the admins.[[User:LM2000|LM2000]] ([[User talk:LM2000|talk]]) 02:59, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
==Your fringe claim at [[Hurricane Harvey]]==
Hello Jdcomix, I've noticed that you removed well sourced content at the article, with the notice, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hurricane_Harvey&oldid=797694949 Take to talk, bordering on WP:FRINGE] Notice, that The Arbitration Committee has permitted Wikipedia administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor editing global warming associated pages. Read more about discretionary sanctions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions If you want to discuss page edits, start a new section on the article talk page. [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 17:50, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
:Check the Harvey talk page, I posted my reasoning there, it also kind of borders on UNDUE to have an entire section dedicated to something covered by one or two sources. I wouldn't be against a brief mention in the lede or something, however. [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 17:52, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
{{Ds/alert|topic=cc}}' |
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext) | '{{talk header|bottom=no|disclaimer=no|wp=no|display_title=custom page title|arpol=no|noarchive=no|search=|User talk:Jdcomix/Archive 1}}
== Gamergate discretionary sanctions notification ==
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''
'''Please carefully read this information:'''
The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate|here]].
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Woodroar|Woodroar]] ([[User talk:Woodroar|talk]]) 17:10, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
:Saw this earlier, already adhering to the restrictions (already made my 1 revert for today). Thanks, though. :) [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 17:11, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
== Thanks ==
Read your reasoned plea for more neutrality on the Anita Sarkeesian article, together with the biased stonewall you immediately and predictably encountered. Just wanted to offer my thanks for having the courage to wade into an incredibly and alarmingly frustrating corner of wikipedia. Here's hoping that one day senior editors can amass the courage to deal with the army of worker bees who pounce on any effort to bring more neutrality to so obviously one-sided articles, such as Sarkeesian's. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/172.79.83.92|172.79.83.92]] ([[User talk:172.79.83.92#top|talk]]) 05:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Their arguments against it were fair, though. The media is obviously biased for Sarkeesian, so there's no good sources criticizing her. [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 14:36, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
== Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Donald_Trump—CNN_beating_video ==
In [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Donald_Trump%E2%80%93CNN_beating_video]] your close was against the raw vote count without an explanation. This would a controversial close even for an admin, and non-admins should not be making controversial closes, so please revert your close. Thank you, [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 14:14, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
:What? The consensus was to redirect/merge. That's what the consensus was, and they provided the best arguements. However, I did !vote on it, so I'll revert the close. If you want to close it for the same reason, feel free to, though. Have a nice day. :) [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 14:35, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
== Franklin 17 ==
Why did you do a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hurricane_Franklin_(2017)&curid=54790413&diff=794760828&oldid=794754758 cut/paste move]? To preserve page history and for the reasons given at [[WP:ATTREQ]], those are not allowed. Wait for an admin to move it. [[User:Yellow Evan|Y]][[User talk:Yellow Evan|E]] <font color="#66666"><sup>[[2017 PHS|Pacific]]</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Yellow Evan|<sup>Hurricane</sup></font>]] 22:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
== what do i do ==
what do i do when i noticed that all of wikis expert sources are wrong about the altleft article then they stop me cause its original reasearch
but i have primary sources that prove my case? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:117E:6D00:3158:C98E:9652:EA0D|2001:8003:117E:6D00:3158:C98E:9652:EA0D]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:117E:6D00:3158:C98E:9652:EA0D#top|talk]]) 17:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== altleft ==
https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/08/18/proposal-for-an-alternative-left/ https://altleft.com/ https://www.reddit.com/r/AlternativeLeft/ <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:117E:6D00:A0C4:8FED:ECAD:1157|2001:8003:117E:6D00:A0C4:8FED:ECAD:1157]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:117E:6D00:A0C4:8FED:ECAD:1157#top|talk]]) 21:39, 21 August 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Appreciate the good faith effort to find some sources, but wordpress isn't a reliable source. Thanks. :) [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 01:07, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
but to quote the wiki editors
'''and, since there seem to be not actual self-identifying adherents,'''
and "there is no alt left"
but i found people who since 2015 have been a group and calling themselves the alternative left and the editors just ignore it, one even said that it was satire i mean i have the truth here and its ignored please read the links read them
[[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:117E:6D00:433:304F:CC39:2D5F|2001:8003:117E:6D00:433:304F:CC39:2D5F]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:117E:6D00:433:304F:CC39:2D5F|talk]]) 00:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guns of Boom]] ==
Hey there.<br />
Your NAC of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guns of Boom|the Guns of Boom AfD]] appears to be an [[WP:BADNAC|inappropriate closure]], as the outcome is a close call or controversial, and should be better left to an admin. Would you please undo your closure and allow an admin to close it? — <span style="background:#0F4D92;color:white;padding:1px 10px;">[[User:Zawl|<span style="color:white;font-variant:Small-caps;">'''Za'''</span>]][[User talk:Zawl|<span style="color:white;font-variant:Small-caps;">'''wl'''</span>]]</span> 19:09, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
:I reverted your closure of the Roman Reigns debate. You really need to read these AfDs before closing them after just glancing at the !votes. You also need to provide rationale for why you closed it the way you did, especially when the !vote is close. Best to leave the really close ones up to the admins.[[User:LM2000|LM2000]] ([[User talk:LM2000|talk]]) 02:59, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
==Your fringe claim at [[Hurricane Harvey]]==
Hello Jdcomix, I've noticed that you removed well sourced content at the article, with the notice, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hurricane_Harvey&oldid=797694949 Take to talk, bordering on WP:FRINGE] Notice, that The Arbitration Committee has permitted Wikipedia administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor editing global warming associated pages. Read more about discretionary sanctions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions If you want to discuss page edits, start a new section on the article talk page. [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 17:50, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
:Check the Harvey talk page, I posted my reasoning there, it also kind of borders on UNDUE to have an entire section dedicated to something covered by one or two sources. I wouldn't be against a brief mention in the lede or something, however. [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 17:52, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
{{subst:alert|cc}} ~~~~' |
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff) | '@@ -48,3 +48,3 @@
Hello Jdcomix, I've noticed that you removed well sourced content at the article, with the notice, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hurricane_Harvey&oldid=797694949 Take to talk, bordering on WP:FRINGE] Notice, that The Arbitration Committee has permitted Wikipedia administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor editing global warming associated pages. Read more about discretionary sanctions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions If you want to discuss page edits, start a new section on the article talk page. [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 17:50, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
:Check the Harvey talk page, I posted my reasoning there, it also kind of borders on UNDUE to have an entire section dedicated to something covered by one or two sources. I wouldn't be against a brief mention in the lede or something, however. [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 17:52, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
-{{Ds/alert|topic=cc}}
+{{subst:alert|cc}} ~~~~
' |
Unified diff of changes made by edit, pre-save transformed (edit_diff_pst) | '@@ -48,3 +48,10 @@
Hello Jdcomix, I've noticed that you removed well sourced content at the article, with the notice, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hurricane_Harvey&oldid=797694949 Take to talk, bordering on WP:FRINGE] Notice, that The Arbitration Committee has permitted Wikipedia administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor editing global warming associated pages. Read more about discretionary sanctions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions If you want to discuss page edits, start a new section on the article talk page. [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 17:50, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
:Check the Harvey talk page, I posted my reasoning there, it also kind of borders on UNDUE to have an entire section dedicated to something covered by one or two sources. I wouldn't be against a brief mention in the lede or something, however. [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 17:52, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
-{{Ds/alert|topic=cc}}
+{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''
+
+'''Please carefully read this information:'''
+
+The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding [[Climate change]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change|here]].
+
+Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
+}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 18:09, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
' |
New page size (new_size) | 8418 |
Old page size (old_size) | 8416 |
Size change in edit (edit_delta) | 2 |
Lines added in edit (added_lines) | [
0 => '{{subst:alert|cc}} ~~~~'
] |
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines) | [
0 => '{{Ds/alert|topic=cc}}'
] |
Lines added in edit, pre-save transformed (added_lines_pst) | [
0 => '{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''',
1 => false,
2 => ''''Please carefully read this information:'''',
3 => false,
4 => 'The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding [[Climate change]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change|here]].',
5 => false,
6 => 'Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.',
7 => '}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 18:09, 28 August 2017 (UTC)'
] |
New page wikitext, pre-save transformed (new_pst) | '{{talk header|bottom=no|disclaimer=no|wp=no|display_title=custom page title|arpol=no|noarchive=no|search=|User talk:Jdcomix/Archive 1}}
== Gamergate discretionary sanctions notification ==
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''
'''Please carefully read this information:'''
The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate|here]].
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Woodroar|Woodroar]] ([[User talk:Woodroar|talk]]) 17:10, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
:Saw this earlier, already adhering to the restrictions (already made my 1 revert for today). Thanks, though. :) [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 17:11, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
== Thanks ==
Read your reasoned plea for more neutrality on the Anita Sarkeesian article, together with the biased stonewall you immediately and predictably encountered. Just wanted to offer my thanks for having the courage to wade into an incredibly and alarmingly frustrating corner of wikipedia. Here's hoping that one day senior editors can amass the courage to deal with the army of worker bees who pounce on any effort to bring more neutrality to so obviously one-sided articles, such as Sarkeesian's. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/172.79.83.92|172.79.83.92]] ([[User talk:172.79.83.92#top|talk]]) 05:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Their arguments against it were fair, though. The media is obviously biased for Sarkeesian, so there's no good sources criticizing her. [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 14:36, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
== Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Donald_Trump—CNN_beating_video ==
In [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Donald_Trump%E2%80%93CNN_beating_video]] your close was against the raw vote count without an explanation. This would a controversial close even for an admin, and non-admins should not be making controversial closes, so please revert your close. Thank you, [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 14:14, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
:What? The consensus was to redirect/merge. That's what the consensus was, and they provided the best arguements. However, I did !vote on it, so I'll revert the close. If you want to close it for the same reason, feel free to, though. Have a nice day. :) [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 14:35, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
== Franklin 17 ==
Why did you do a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hurricane_Franklin_(2017)&curid=54790413&diff=794760828&oldid=794754758 cut/paste move]? To preserve page history and for the reasons given at [[WP:ATTREQ]], those are not allowed. Wait for an admin to move it. [[User:Yellow Evan|Y]][[User talk:Yellow Evan|E]] <font color="#66666"><sup>[[2017 PHS|Pacific]]</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Yellow Evan|<sup>Hurricane</sup></font>]] 22:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
== what do i do ==
what do i do when i noticed that all of wikis expert sources are wrong about the altleft article then they stop me cause its original reasearch
but i have primary sources that prove my case? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:117E:6D00:3158:C98E:9652:EA0D|2001:8003:117E:6D00:3158:C98E:9652:EA0D]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:117E:6D00:3158:C98E:9652:EA0D#top|talk]]) 17:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== altleft ==
https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/08/18/proposal-for-an-alternative-left/ https://altleft.com/ https://www.reddit.com/r/AlternativeLeft/ <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:117E:6D00:A0C4:8FED:ECAD:1157|2001:8003:117E:6D00:A0C4:8FED:ECAD:1157]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:117E:6D00:A0C4:8FED:ECAD:1157#top|talk]]) 21:39, 21 August 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Appreciate the good faith effort to find some sources, but wordpress isn't a reliable source. Thanks. :) [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 01:07, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
but to quote the wiki editors
'''and, since there seem to be not actual self-identifying adherents,'''
and "there is no alt left"
but i found people who since 2015 have been a group and calling themselves the alternative left and the editors just ignore it, one even said that it was satire i mean i have the truth here and its ignored please read the links read them
[[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:117E:6D00:433:304F:CC39:2D5F|2001:8003:117E:6D00:433:304F:CC39:2D5F]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:117E:6D00:433:304F:CC39:2D5F|talk]]) 00:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guns of Boom]] ==
Hey there.<br />
Your NAC of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guns of Boom|the Guns of Boom AfD]] appears to be an [[WP:BADNAC|inappropriate closure]], as the outcome is a close call or controversial, and should be better left to an admin. Would you please undo your closure and allow an admin to close it? — <span style="background:#0F4D92;color:white;padding:1px 10px;">[[User:Zawl|<span style="color:white;font-variant:Small-caps;">'''Za'''</span>]][[User talk:Zawl|<span style="color:white;font-variant:Small-caps;">'''wl'''</span>]]</span> 19:09, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
:I reverted your closure of the Roman Reigns debate. You really need to read these AfDs before closing them after just glancing at the !votes. You also need to provide rationale for why you closed it the way you did, especially when the !vote is close. Best to leave the really close ones up to the admins.[[User:LM2000|LM2000]] ([[User talk:LM2000|talk]]) 02:59, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
==Your fringe claim at [[Hurricane Harvey]]==
Hello Jdcomix, I've noticed that you removed well sourced content at the article, with the notice, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hurricane_Harvey&oldid=797694949 Take to talk, bordering on WP:FRINGE] Notice, that The Arbitration Committee has permitted Wikipedia administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor editing global warming associated pages. Read more about discretionary sanctions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions If you want to discuss page edits, start a new section on the article talk page. [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 17:50, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
:Check the Harvey talk page, I posted my reasoning there, it also kind of borders on UNDUE to have an entire section dedicated to something covered by one or two sources. I wouldn't be against a brief mention in the lede or something, however. [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix#top|talk]]) 17:52, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''
'''Please carefully read this information:'''
The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding [[Climate change]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change|here]].
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 18:09, 28 August 2017 (UTC)' |
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node) | 0 |
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp) | 1503943772 |