Edit filter log - Wikipedia

Let's discuss this instead of edit warring. The fact that Leto's and Smith's performances received ''some'' praise is determined by reliable sources rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. They are not mentioned as praiseworthy, as you said, but just as better received in relation to the overall critical response to the film, and this is reflected in the reviews included in the article. The sourced material you removed has had a [[WP:EDITCON|consensus through editing]], so please discuss on the talk page and seek a new consensus if you disagree.--[[User:Earthh|Earthh]] ([[User talk:Earthh|talk]]) 11:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Let's discuss this instead of edit warring. The fact that Leto's and Smith's performances received ''some'' praise is determined by reliable sources rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. They are not mentioned as praiseworthy, as you said, but just as better received in relation to the overall critical response to the film, and this is reflected in the reviews included in the article. The sourced material you removed has had a [[WP:EDITCON|consensus through editing]], so please discuss on the talk page and seek a new consensus if you disagree.--[[User:Earthh|Earthh]] ([[User talk:Earthh|talk]]) 11:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Morbius (film)]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.</s>{{Break}}The information you removed had been in place since 31 March and was unchallenged until you removed it. That classifies as [[WP:EDITCONSENSUS|consensus through editing]]. Since your removal was challenged, please restore it and discuss on the talk page.--[[User:Earthh|Earthh]] ([[User talk:Earthh|talk]]) 17:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

7913

'Earthh'

381439652

[ 0 => 'autoreviewer', 1 => 'extendedconfirmed', 2 => 'patroller', 3 => '*', 4 => 'user', 5 => 'autoconfirmed' ]

[ 0 => 'autopatrol', 1 => 'extendedconfirmed', 2 => 'patrol', 3 => 'createaccount', 4 => 'read', 5 => 'edit', 6 => 'createtalk', 7 => 'writeapi', 8 => 'viewmywatchlist', 9 => 'editmywatchlist', 10 => 'viewmyprivateinfo', 11 => 'editmyprivateinfo', 12 => 'editmyoptions', 13 => 'abusefilter-log-detail', 14 => 'urlshortener-create-url', 15 => 'centralauth-merge', 16 => 'abusefilter-view', 17 => 'abusefilter-log', 18 => 'vipsscaler-test', 19 => 'collectionsaveasuserpage', 20 => 'reupload-own', 21 => 'move-rootuserpages', 22 => 'createpage', 23 => 'minoredit', 24 => 'editmyusercss', 25 => 'editmyuserjson', 26 => 'editmyuserjs', 27 => 'purge', 28 => 'sendemail', 29 => 'applychangetags', 30 => 'spamblacklistlog', 31 => 'mwoauthmanagemygrants', 32 => 'reupload', 33 => 'upload', 34 => 'move', 35 => 'autoconfirmed', 36 => 'editsemiprotected', 37 => 'skipcaptcha', 38 => 'transcode-reset', 39 => 'transcode-status', 40 => 'createpagemainns', 41 => 'movestable', 42 => 'autoreview' ]

false

false

20448100

3

'Toa Nidhiki05'

'User talk:Toa Nidhiki05'

[]

421979047

'edit'

'Undid revision 1082532854 by [[Special:Contributions/Toa Nidhiki05|Toa Nidhiki05]] ([[User talk:Toa Nidhiki05|talk]]) per [[WP:BLANKING]]'

'wikitext'

'wikitext'

'{{Usertalkback|you=watched|me=watched|icon=lang}} {{User:MiszaBot/config |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |maxarchivesize = 70K |counter = 19 |minthreadsleft = 4 |minthreadstoarchive = 1 |algo = old(90d) |archive = User talk:Toa Nidhiki05/Archive %(counter)d }} {{archives |search= yes |collapsed= yes |image= |bot=MiszaBot III }} == WikiCup 2018 November newsletter == The WikiCup is over for another year! Our '''Champion''' this year is {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Courcelles}}, who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows: #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Courcelles}} #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Kosack}} #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Kees08}} #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|SounderBruce}} #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Casliber}} #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Nova Crystallis}} #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Iazyges}} #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Ceranthor}} All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants: *{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Casliber}} wins the FA prize, for three featured articles in round 2. *{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Courcelles}} wins the GA prize, for 92 good articles in round 3. *{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Kosack}} wins the FL prize, for five featured lists overall. *{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Cartoon network freak}} wins the topic prize, for 30 articles in good topics overall. *{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Usernameunique }} wins the DYK prize, for 24 did you know articles in round 3. *{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Zanhe}} wins the ITN prize, for 17 in the news articles overall. *{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Aoba47}} wins the GAR prize, for 43 good article reviews in round 1. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient! Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to '''[[Wikipedia:WikiCup/2019 signups|sign up to participate]]'''; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> {{User4|Sturmvogel 66}}, {{User4|Godot13}}, {{user4|Cwmhiraeth}} and {{User4|Vanamonde93}}. <!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=866078143 --> == [[Democratic Socialists of America]] == == ''The Signpost'': 30 January 2022 == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-01-30}} </div><!--Volume 18, Issue 1--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2022-01-30|Single-page]] * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] * [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 20:22, 30 January 2022 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script ([[User:Evad37/SPS]]) --></div></div> <!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1068884160 --> == Casting Crowns == Hi Toa, It's a pleasure to meet you. I've known you to be active in CCM related music for a while, but I don't usually edit in that particular area. Your work with CC is impressive, and I recently began working as an intern with [[WCTL]]. In their office, they have an RIAA gold award for their self-titled record, as well as an award for "[[If We Are the Body]]" - I don't remember if that one was a number-one or an RIAA award. I have never uploaded a photo to Wikimedia before, but would you welcome a shot of these to add to the articles? '''[[User:DannyMusicEditor|<span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">danny</span><small>music</small><span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">editor</span>]]''' ^{[[User talk:DannyMusicEditor|oops]]} 14:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC) :Allow me to correct myself. The gold award is for ''[[Until the Whole World Hears]]''. The self-titled award is platinum, and "If We Are the Body" is a #1 award. '''[[User:DannyMusicEditor|<span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">danny</span><small>music</small><span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">editor</span>]]''' ^{[[User talk:DannyMusicEditor|oops]]} 14:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC) ::Hey {{u|DannyMusicEditor}}! Glad to see someone likes my articles, ha! That seems very cool and would absolutely be welcome I would think - if you have a picture of the record certifications, that would be a really nice touch for the articles I would think! Could also be a good fit on their main artist page. Let me know when they're uploaded and I'll give them a look. '''[[User:Toa Nidhiki05|<i style="color: green; font-family: Mistral;">Toa</i>]] [[User talk:Toa Nidhiki05|<i style="color: green; font-family: Mistral;">Nidhiki05</i>]]''' 15:04, 15 February 2022 (UTC) :::Okay so [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UTWWH_Gold_record.jpeg here] is my first upload - I have no idea how to license it. Do you know what I'm supposed to do with it? EDIT: After following another example, I think I got it? Let me know what you think. I was thinking we could stuff it around "Release and sales" on the album. '''[[User:DannyMusicEditor|<span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">danny</span><small>music</small><span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">editor</span>]]''' ^{[[User talk:DannyMusicEditor|oops]]} 19:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC) == ''The Signpost'': 27 February 2022 == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-02-27}} </div><!--Volume 18, Issue 2--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2022-02-27|Single-page]] * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] * [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 20:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script ([[User:Evad37/SPS]]) --></div></div> <!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1074308399 --> == reverting == please stop reverting a change the the independent party usa wiki page as this does have fact compared to fiction and if you wish for wikipedia to be a creditable source you should leave political bias out. [[User:Diepanzerwaffles|Diepanzerwaffles]] ([[User talk:Diepanzerwaffles|talk]]) 12:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC) == WikiCup 2022 March newsletter == And so ends the first round of the [[Wikipedia:WikiCup|WikiCup]]. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were: *{{flagicon|New York (state)}} [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]], a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings. *{{flagicon|Christmas Island}} [[User:AryKun|AryKun]], new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds. *{{flagicon|Kingdom of Scotland|old}} [[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]], a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs. *{{flagicon|Philadelphia}} [[User:GhostRiver|GhostRiver]] was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs. *{{flagicon|United Nations}} [[User:Kavyansh.Singh|Kavyansh.Singh]] was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews. *[[File:Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg|23px|link=Flag of Provo, Utah]] [[User:SounderBruce|SounderBruce]] was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways. *{{flagicon|United Nations}} [[User:Ktin|Ktin]], another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items. These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants. Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed]]. Questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) and [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1075012939 --> == WikiCup 2022 March newsletter == And so ends the first round of the [[Wikipedia:WikiCup|WikiCup]]. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were: *{{flagicon|New York (state)}} [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]], a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings. *{{flagicon|Christmas Island}} [[User:AryKun|AryKun]], new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds. *{{flagicon|Kingdom of Scotland|old}} [[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]], a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs. *{{flagicon|Philadelphia}} [[User:GhostRiver|GhostRiver]] was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs. *{{flagicon|United Nations}} [[User:Kavyansh.Singh|Kavyansh.Singh]] was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews. *[[File:Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg|23px|link=Flag of Provo, Utah]] [[User:SounderBruce|SounderBruce]] was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways. *{{flagicon|United Nations}} [[User:Ktin|Ktin]], another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items. These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants. Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed]]. Questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) and [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1075012939 --> == ''The Signpost'': 27 March 2022 == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-03-27}} </div><!--Volume 18, Issue 3--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2022-03-27|Single-page]] * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] * [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 20:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script ([[User:Evad37/SPS]]) --></div></div> <!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1078525990 --> == Morbius == Let's discuss this instead of edit warring. The fact that Leto's and Smith's performances received ''some'' praise is determined by reliable sources rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. They are not mentioned as praiseworthy, as you said, but just as better received in relation to the overall critical response to the film, and this is reflected in the reviews included in the article. The sourced material you removed has had a [[WP:EDITCON|consensus through editing]], so please discuss on the talk page and seek a new consensus if you disagree.--[[User:Earthh|Earthh]] ([[User talk:Earthh|talk]]) 11:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC)'

'{{Usertalkback|you=watched|me=watched|icon=lang}} {{User:MiszaBot/config |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |maxarchivesize = 70K |counter = 19 |minthreadsleft = 4 |minthreadstoarchive = 1 |algo = old(90d) |archive = User talk:Toa Nidhiki05/Archive %(counter)d }} {{archives |search= yes |collapsed= yes |image= |bot=MiszaBot III }} == WikiCup 2018 November newsletter == The WikiCup is over for another year! Our '''Champion''' this year is {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Courcelles}}, who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows: #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Courcelles}} #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Kosack}} #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Kees08}} #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|SounderBruce}} #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Casliber}} #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Nova Crystallis}} #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Iazyges}} #{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Ceranthor}} All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants: *{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Casliber}} wins the FA prize, for three featured articles in round 2. *{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Courcelles}} wins the GA prize, for 92 good articles in round 3. *{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Kosack}} wins the FL prize, for five featured lists overall. *{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Cartoon network freak}} wins the topic prize, for 30 articles in good topics overall. *{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Usernameunique }} wins the DYK prize, for 24 did you know articles in round 3. *{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Zanhe}} wins the ITN prize, for 17 in the news articles overall. *{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant9|Aoba47}} wins the GAR prize, for 43 good article reviews in round 1. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient! Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to '''[[Wikipedia:WikiCup/2019 signups|sign up to participate]]'''; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> {{User4|Sturmvogel 66}}, {{User4|Godot13}}, {{user4|Cwmhiraeth}} and {{User4|Vanamonde93}}. <!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=866078143 --> == [[Democratic Socialists of America]] == == ''The Signpost'': 30 January 2022 == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-01-30}} </div><!--Volume 18, Issue 1--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2022-01-30|Single-page]] * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] * [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 20:22, 30 January 2022 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script ([[User:Evad37/SPS]]) --></div></div> <!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1068884160 --> == Casting Crowns == Hi Toa, It's a pleasure to meet you. I've known you to be active in CCM related music for a while, but I don't usually edit in that particular area. Your work with CC is impressive, and I recently began working as an intern with [[WCTL]]. In their office, they have an RIAA gold award for their self-titled record, as well as an award for "[[If We Are the Body]]" - I don't remember if that one was a number-one or an RIAA award. I have never uploaded a photo to Wikimedia before, but would you welcome a shot of these to add to the articles? '''[[User:DannyMusicEditor|<span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">danny</span><small>music</small><span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">editor</span>]]''' ^{[[User talk:DannyMusicEditor|oops]]} 14:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC) :Allow me to correct myself. The gold award is for ''[[Until the Whole World Hears]]''. The self-titled award is platinum, and "If We Are the Body" is a #1 award. '''[[User:DannyMusicEditor|<span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">danny</span><small>music</small><span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">editor</span>]]''' ^{[[User talk:DannyMusicEditor|oops]]} 14:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC) ::Hey {{u|DannyMusicEditor}}! Glad to see someone likes my articles, ha! That seems very cool and would absolutely be welcome I would think - if you have a picture of the record certifications, that would be a really nice touch for the articles I would think! Could also be a good fit on their main artist page. Let me know when they're uploaded and I'll give them a look. '''[[User:Toa Nidhiki05|<i style="color: green; font-family: Mistral;">Toa</i>]] [[User talk:Toa Nidhiki05|<i style="color: green; font-family: Mistral;">Nidhiki05</i>]]''' 15:04, 15 February 2022 (UTC) :::Okay so [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UTWWH_Gold_record.jpeg here] is my first upload - I have no idea how to license it. Do you know what I'm supposed to do with it? EDIT: After following another example, I think I got it? Let me know what you think. I was thinking we could stuff it around "Release and sales" on the album. '''[[User:DannyMusicEditor|<span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">danny</span><small>music</small><span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">editor</span>]]''' ^{[[User talk:DannyMusicEditor|oops]]} 19:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC) == ''The Signpost'': 27 February 2022 == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-02-27}} </div><!--Volume 18, Issue 2--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2022-02-27|Single-page]] * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] * [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 20:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script ([[User:Evad37/SPS]]) --></div></div> <!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1074308399 --> == reverting == please stop reverting a change the the independent party usa wiki page as this does have fact compared to fiction and if you wish for wikipedia to be a creditable source you should leave political bias out. [[User:Diepanzerwaffles|Diepanzerwaffles]] ([[User talk:Diepanzerwaffles|talk]]) 12:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC) == WikiCup 2022 March newsletter == And so ends the first round of the [[Wikipedia:WikiCup|WikiCup]]. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were: *{{flagicon|New York (state)}} [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]], a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings. *{{flagicon|Christmas Island}} [[User:AryKun|AryKun]], new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds. *{{flagicon|Kingdom of Scotland|old}} [[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]], a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs. *{{flagicon|Philadelphia}} [[User:GhostRiver|GhostRiver]] was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs. *{{flagicon|United Nations}} [[User:Kavyansh.Singh|Kavyansh.Singh]] was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews. *[[File:Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg|23px|link=Flag of Provo, Utah]] [[User:SounderBruce|SounderBruce]] was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways. *{{flagicon|United Nations}} [[User:Ktin|Ktin]], another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items. These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants. Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed]]. Questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) and [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1075012939 --> == WikiCup 2022 March newsletter == And so ends the first round of the [[Wikipedia:WikiCup|WikiCup]]. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were: *{{flagicon|New York (state)}} [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]], a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings. *{{flagicon|Christmas Island}} [[User:AryKun|AryKun]], new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds. *{{flagicon|Kingdom of Scotland|old}} [[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]], a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs. *{{flagicon|Philadelphia}} [[User:GhostRiver|GhostRiver]] was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs. *{{flagicon|United Nations}} [[User:Kavyansh.Singh|Kavyansh.Singh]] was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews. *[[File:Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg|23px|link=Flag of Provo, Utah]] [[User:SounderBruce|SounderBruce]] was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways. *{{flagicon|United Nations}} [[User:Ktin|Ktin]], another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items. These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants. Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed]]. Questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) and [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1075012939 --> == ''The Signpost'': 27 March 2022 == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-03-27}} </div><!--Volume 18, Issue 3--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2022-03-27|Single-page]] * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] * [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 20:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script ([[User:Evad37/SPS]]) --></div></div> <!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1078525990 --> == Morbius == Let's discuss this instead of edit warring. The fact that Leto's and Smith's performances received ''some'' praise is determined by reliable sources rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. They are not mentioned as praiseworthy, as you said, but just as better received in relation to the overall critical response to the film, and this is reflected in the reviews included in the article. The sourced material you removed has had a [[WP:EDITCON|consensus through editing]], so please discuss on the talk page and seek a new consensus if you disagree.--[[User:Earthh|Earthh]] ([[User talk:Earthh|talk]]) 11:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC) [[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Morbius (film)]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.</s>{{Break}}The information you removed had been in place since 31 March and was unchallenged until you removed it. That classifies as [[WP:EDITCONSENSUS|consensus through editing]]. Since your removal was challenged, please restore it and discuss on the talk page.--[[User:Earthh|Earthh]] ([[User talk:Earthh|talk]]) 17:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)'

'@@ -121,2 +121,6 @@ Let's discuss this instead of edit warring. The fact that Leto's and Smith's performances received ''some'' praise is determined by reliable sources rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. They are not mentioned as praiseworthy, as you said, but just as better received in relation to the overall critical response to the film, and this is reflected in the reviews included in the article. The sourced material you removed has had a [[WP:EDITCON|consensus through editing]], so please discuss on the talk page and seek a new consensus if you disagree.--[[User:Earthh|Earthh]] ([[User talk:Earthh|talk]]) 11:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC) + +[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Morbius (film)]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. + +'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.</s>{{Break}}The information you removed had been in place since 31 March and was unchallenged until you removed it. That classifies as [[WP:EDITCONSENSUS|consensus through editing]]. Since your removal was challenged, please restore it and discuss on the talk page.--[[User:Earthh|Earthh]] ([[User talk:Earthh|talk]]) 17:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC) '

18181

16021

2160

[ 0 => '', 1 => '[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Morbius (film)]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. ', 2 => '', 3 => ''''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.</s>{{Break}}The information you removed had been in place since 31 March and was unchallenged until you removed it. That classifies as [[WP:EDITCONSENSUS|consensus through editing]]. Since your removal was challenged, please restore it and discuss on the talk page.--[[User:Earthh|Earthh]] ([[User talk:Earthh|talk]]) 17:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)' ]

[]

[]

[]

[]

false

1649874654