User talk:Strattonsmith: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Tag: Reverted

Tag: Reverted

Line 71:

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|lose their editing privileges]] on that page. This isn't done to [[WP:BLOCKP|punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring]]. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Eridian314|Eridian314]] ([[User talk:Eridian314|talk]]) 17:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

:hello. I think you should read some Wiki policies. [[MOS:GENDERID]]: "Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. " --[[User:HHH Pedrigree|HHH Pedrigree]] ([[User talk:HHH Pedrigree|talk]]) 17:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes at the point at which the person was that gender. Wikipedia has become a religion rather than a thinking institution and some of its scribes blindly utter policy rather positing how it applies in reality. At that point the person wrestling was a man it is an inaccurate version of history step out of yourself and paint the multi-faced picture in a historically accurate manner. This person knows they cannot win this fight on Wikipedia but for history's sake you are wrong[[User:Strattonsmith|Strattonsmith]] ([[User talk:Strattonsmith#top|talk]]) 17:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)