Content deleted Content added
Line 603: :::::::This is the overview article of Zionism yes, but we should take the [[Timeline of Zionism]] as far back as there are reliable sources. Not hitting on every single point, but if an event appears in a sufficient number of RS, [[WP:DUE]] doesn't justify excluding that except in cases of extreme length. I didn't say to include ''any'' journal article, but when we look at weight, there are many reliable journals and journal articles to include. Similarly, specialized books. I don't agree that any fact not in the books but in journal articles doesn't belong in the overview article. I think that's an overzealous skimming of the cream. We need a bit of [[half and half]] too. {{tq|Neutrality requires that mainspace articles and pages fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in those sources}} If it's not 0, I don't see how 0 is a fair proportion for a significant fact. '''[[User:Andrevan|Andre]]'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">[[User_talk:Andrevan|🚐]]</span> 06:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC) ::::::The weight of various aspects should reflect that in RS. +1 to the explanation Levivich has given many many times on this page. [[User:DMH223344|DMH223344]] ([[User talk:DMH223344|talk]]) 05:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC) :::::::Andrevan. You participated intensely in our discussion on (b)restricting composition of this page to the very best latest academic sources, and approved of the high bar Levivich and others set forth. In this thread, you are taking the diametrically opposed view for the pre-history of Zionism, with (b) an open Sesame policy to a huge source base that is not primarily about Zionism. Why the double standard, when the general consensus that emerged was in favour of one restrictive criterion, in a short range of best recent research, consensually drawn up?[[User:Nishidani|Nishidani]] ([[User talk:Nishidani|talk]]) 08:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC) | |||