Talk:Islamic State - Wikipedia


3 people in discussion

Article Images

Note 1

This talk page has a history of high levels of activity. Please check to see whether your additional content can be added to an existing discussion section, and please make new section titles as precise as possible.

Note 2

Please complete citations attached to article content with fields such as Author, Title, URL, Date, Publisher/Work, Agency and Access Date. (See footnotes guide above.) (If you would like to copy the footnotes guide to your userpage, put this template in the Edit Page – {{User:P123ct1/My template}} – and it will display the guide.)
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Islamic State. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Islamic State at the Reference desk.
Censorship warningWikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.
Islamic State received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
Media mention
Censorship warningWikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS

The article Islamic State, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:

  • Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Remedy instructions and exemptions

Enforcement procedures:

  • Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard.
  • Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
  • An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.

With respect to any reverting restrictions:

  • Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
  • Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
  • Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
  • Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

 This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

one of isis ideology hate and spreading propaganda and killing muslims even though they call them selves "muslims" sources: https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2016/0706/In-Ramadan-attacks-ISIS-reveals-its-top-target-other-Muslims https://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/editorials/article95163232.html https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/muslims-isis-attacks also they share videos of killing innocent muslims sunnis included I. .i l c r (talk) 03:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: I don't know what you request to edit. TheNuggeteer (talk) 11:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
nobody claimed the medina bombing, and when IS kills a sunni its not because the victim was a sunni. Anders Breivik killed many white people, doesnt make him a self-hating anti-white racist as he didnt target them for their race 157.157.149.105 (talk) 13:32, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@157.157.149.105 How is this related to the request? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 13:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Just wondering, what is the reason for the unusually long ideology list, when they are all included in Islamic Statism and more specifically described there. Wouldn’t it be better to just put Islamic Statism? Ilamxan (talk) 18:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Should we list certain groups under other "Provinces" such as Ansar al-Khalifah Philippines and MIT under East Asia Province, some of the Pakistani groups under Pakistan Province or Khorasan Province (depending on the area of operation), Kurdistan Province under Iraq Province, etc?

Also list groups such as Ansar al-Khalifah Brazil under "un-organized" cells while moving Azerbaijan, Tunis, and Lebanon Province to "groups" as their officially acknowledged by IS as official branches Alexander141104 (talk) 21:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

It's what the government calls them. This name legitimises them. And it's used far more broadly in the world for other things. 82.33.117.11 (talk) 09:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@82.33.117.11, we could start by educating them as most media houses, personnel and people; we don't need to campaign for them or confuse people by keeping the name Islamic. It's best to make it Daesh, Arab governments also address it by that name Ultimate Tai (talk) 10:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

At the end of the list of ideologies encomapssed by the IS, there is no period. I think a period should be added after the word "Misogyny." IvyYorke (talk) 20:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply