Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 01:33, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Add a short description to the top of the article with the template {{short description}}.
- Done. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Consider adding ALT to images (this is not a GA criteria but is good practice per MOS:ALT).
- Done. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- "The two most distinctive features of Megalograptus was its massive and spined forward-facing appendages, far larger than similar structures in other eurypterids, and its telson (final body segment), which was surrounded by unique "cercal blades", capable of grasping. " – should be "were" as the features are plural.
- Fixed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- "Megalograptus are known from what was once near-shore marine " – consider rewording.
- Reworded and made more concise. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Fixed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- "The appendages of Megalograptus, about 3.5 times the length of the carapace were significantly larger than those of Mixopterus" – add comma after "carapace".
- Done. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- "Megalograptus was the structure formed by the telson and the immediate preceding segment (the pretelson)." – I believe should be the adverb "immediately".
- Yes, fixed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- "On thecarapace, they were flat and disc-like and scattered without any obvious pattern" – Add space between "the carapace".
- Fixed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- @Ichthyovenator: Excellent work. This article is now ready to review. simongraham (talk) 19:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Comprehension: The comprehension is good.
Undetermined
Criteria |
Notes |
Result
|
(a) (prose) |
The prose is generally clear, concise and understandable. |
Pass
|
(b) (MoS) |
The article is compliant with the manual of style. |
Pass
|
- Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
Pass
Criteria |
Notes |
Result
|
(a) (references) |
The article has a list of references and in-line citations for its contents in the body. |
Pass
|
(b) (citations to reliable sources) |
Sources used are reliable. |
Pass
|
(c) (original research) |
No original research found. |
Pass
|
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism) |
No flagrant copyright issues found with Earwig's Copyvio Detector. |
Pass
|
- Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.
Pass
Criteria |
Notes |
Result
|
(a) (major aspects) |
The article broadly covers all major aspects. |
Pass
|
(b) (focused) |
The article is focused without unnecessary deviations. |
Pass
|
- Neutrality: The article is neutral.
Pass
Notes |
Result
|
The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view. |
Pass
|
- Stability: The article is stable.
Pass
Notes |
Result
|
No ongoing content disputes or edit wars present. |
Pass
|
- Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
Pass
Criteria |
Notes |
Result
|
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) |
No copyright issues found, images are appropriately tagged. |
Pass
|
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) |
Use and caption are good. |
Pass
|
- Overall: Pass/fail.
Pass
Notes |
Result
|
Congratulations, Ichthyovenator. The article meets the criteria to be a Good Article. |
Pass
|
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.